Share

Reaching an understanding

Reaching an understanding
Opinion

Reaching an understanding

Finance | 1 Dec 2006

Paul Bennett urges senior management to ‘talk the talk’.

The boss finishes his rousing strategy speech to warm applause and then inevitably asks if there are any questions. None are offered so he packs up his notes, satisfied, leaves the podium heading to the airport. He ponders in the taxi, why he had worried about the speech. It seemed to have gone down very well, and more surprisingly, they had got it.

The audience meanwhile, shuffle out to the coffee machine, and start to discuss the details of the boss’s twelve-element strategy with seven sub-criteria in each element. ‘He totally lost me on the point about global footprint,’ said one. ‘I was lost way before that.’ said another. ‘Well why the hell didn’t you speak up at the end, during question time, to clarify?’ says the project manager. ‘We have got to implement this thing starting Monday.’

The above incident is not unique. It occurs at all levels throughout the international business community. The consequences of that miscommunication can be very different, depending on the circumstances, and the depth of lack of understanding.

There can be many reasons why people will not put their hands up and ask the burning question that needs to be asked. They may not want to appear stupid for not getting the sophisticated messages immediately. They may not want to ask the boss because he always takes a dim view of people who ask dumb questions. They could simply be waiting for some other brave soul to ask the question everyone wants answering.

There are many more reasons just as valid and just as responsible for further negating the transfer of the required information at the most effective time. That is to say, when everyone is still in the meeting.

‘There is nothing more mysterious than the power of speech,’ said Edward Thomas. He really could have added ‘to confuse or convince in equal measure’. I am regularly astonished by our inability to convey even the simplest of messages. I was working recently at a very respected company in Canary Wharf. I was delivering a key note speech on corporate communication and to my surprise and delight, the company name was spelt two different ways in the very building I was doing the talk. It really was a great opener for the talk.

In another instance, I was struggling at a supermarket recently because the eggs were classified by a numerical scale. ‘Which is the largest egg, one or five?’ I asked an assistant. ‘No idea,’ he said. ‘Look inside the box.’ I checked in another supermarket and was glad to find that the eggs were classified as large, medium or small. It did not need a question to work out which was large.

Ruthless simplicity is the key to ensure that the information we are trying to convey is fully understood by those we are trying to inform. My earliest and most memorable example of how not to do this was as a young apprentice in the Royal Navy. We were on a leadership programme in the Welsh mountains and at that time our senior officer was a formidable man called Tony Moore. Just as the sun was setting at 4.30 in the afternoon he asked one of the apprentices, ‘what time is it young man?’

The young chap in question looked at his watch nervously and said ‘Half past four Sir.’ Tony Moore’s face went purple in rage, as he chastised the young man, replying: ‘I don’t know what village you are depriving of an idiot, you are in the Royal Navy now laddie, and when I ask what time it is I expect a full maritime response, do you understand?’ I looked at the poor young guy and soon realised he had no idea what Tony was on about. It transpired Tony simply wanted the answer using the 24-hour clock. Tony asked again, ‘So, what time is it?’ The apprentice looked at his watch, swallowed hard and replied: ‘Half past four, me hearty.’

I still laugh now, but it regularly reminds me, that we need to talk the talk, so people get it.

Paul Bennett is client director at Henley Management College 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Timeline: Coalition government so far

14 May 2012

It’s two years since Britain voted in the previously unlikely coalition of the Conservatives and Liberal...

Where for art thou major donors?

14 May 2012

Philip Spedding invokes an anecdote about the Tate to lambast the government's proposed cap on tax relief...

emailalert