Share

Reading between the lines

Reading between the lines
Opinion

Reading between the lines

Finance | William Jensen | 27 Apr 2008

Who knows the outcome of the latest volume of the history of investment, asks William Jensen.

Having followed closely the pronouncements of central bankers, investment professionals and economists, I have come to the uncomfortable conclusion that only the delusional believe they can foresee the outcome of the current economic uncertainty with any confidence. That’s not to denigrate academic theory or practitioners’ experience, but an acknowledgement that we have passed the introduction and are well into the opening chapters of an adventure struc-tured around familiar themes but with significant new twists. It is Romeo and Juliet in the age of mobile phones, human rights and Facebook.

There are a few characters and sub-plots that are new to this drama. Let’s start with banking. It is nothing new to have each generation of bankers proclaim a new paradigm and declare the end of losses by the medium of superior credit management. By the same token, the current litany of provisions is a familiar cyclical tale. Arguably, what is different is the massive gearing of bank assets in this cycle and the potential of that and the interdependency of counterparty obligations to turn western economies into a dustbowl.

We are assured that US and European banks remain solvent, despite the scale of asset impairments, but tier 1 capital ratios are, in many instances, sinking to the lower thresholds as off-balance sheet SIVs and conduits have been given emergency funding, taken back onto the book or, in some instances, allowed to wither. As LIBOR rates returned to near normal in the first weeks of this year, it seemed that the liquidity crisis had been overcome. In recent weeks, it has re-emerged with a vengeance in the shape of rising margin calls on hedge funds, causing some of the most distinguished names to falter. None of this bodes well for early or sustainable recovery.

White knights often play a dramatic role in the familiar moral tale and in the global capital markets they ride under the banner of central banks. The tension that central bankers face in this drama between the need to pacify anxious investors with the balm of easy money and the growing threat of a secular turn in the inflationary cycle has intensi-fied in the last two months. Even the most trenchant believer in the death of inflation is hard-pressed to convince that the current trend in energy, raw material and agricultural commodity prices is but a transitory cyclical blip. Keep an eye on unemployment trends for the recessionary side of the equation and wage settlements for the inflationary forces.

And what of the strangers to this once-familiar tale? They come in the guise of confident, emerging economies where resources – human, land, oil and minerals – abound and where there is now a depth of political and economic aptitude that did not underpin permanence in previous cycles. We should welcome the momentum that these newly-confident political economies bring to the global markets but we should be under no illusion that Europe and the US are subject to a transfer of economic dominance with which will carry a penalty when its full ramifications are understood.

The thinking contrarian investor, much like the literary critic, will find opportunity in this tableau, but not necessarily where it is most expected. Tactical flexibility may also be a condition for successful outcomes, possibly over-riding strategic frameworks. The mispricing of some high quality debt may generate opportunities to capture equity-like returns, but with higher probability of delivery based on low default risk; rising energy and commodity prices may point to longer-term opportunities in the equity of generators, extractors and landowners, but not necessarily in the volatile arbitrage between spot and forward prices; and finally battered shares in companies that either have a strong presence in emerging markets or may become the targets of emerging market liquidity may be a better bet than the inflated and vulnerable emerging equity markets themselves. Expect surprises as you read your way through this volume in the long history of commerce.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Timeline: Coalition government so far

14 May 2012

It’s two years since Britain voted in the previously unlikely coalition of the Conservatives and Liberal...

Where for art thou major donors?

14 May 2012

Philip Spedding invokes an anecdote about the Tate to lambast the government's proposed cap on tax relief...

emailalert