Share

Bowcock explains calculation behind £1bn tax relief cap estimate

Matthew Bowcock, chair, Community Foundation Network
News

Bowcock explains calculation behind £1bn tax relief cap estimate1

Finance | Tania Mason | 16 Apr 2012

Community Foundation Network chair Matthew Bowcock has admitted that his estimate of £1bn for how much the tax relief cap will cost charities, is based on a “very simple, high-level analysis, because we don’t have the details we need”.

Bowcock wrote to the Evening Standard last week to say that the proposed cap could cost the sector £1bn, while only earning additional tax revenues for the Exchequer of £200m.  Civilsociety.co.uk had queried how he arrived at the £1bn figure, and this morning he responded.

Bowcock admitted his estimate was merely a guess, that £2bn of the total £11bn given by private donors is given by donors whose giving would exceed the tax relief cap. But it is “based on a common-sense analysis of the facts, such that we know them”.

Bowcock explained that his starting point was Coutts’ Million Pound Donors Report, which said that in 2009/10, 174 people made donations to charity of more than £1m each, amounting to a total of £1.3bn.

“What I then tried to do was extrapolate out how much of the total £11bn of private giving is given by donors who would be caught by the proposed tax relief cap. We don’t know, it’s very difficult to say. Only HMRC has that data, and they won’t give it out.

“But I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say there’s a very good chance that maybe £2bn is given above the proposed cap. Therefore how much will reduce? Again, we don’t know, we’re all trying to guess what people’s behaviour might be if they didn’t receive tax relief of a certain amount. But we do know that if all those donors were paying tax at the higher rate of 45 per cent, there’s £950m gone.”

He added that the Philanthropy Review, in its report published six months ago, expressed its frustration at the lack of hard data about charitable giving. “It’s daft that we know that 47 or 48 per cent of donations comes from about 7 per cent of donors, but we don’t know anything about what’s within that. Is it all from people at the top end, people in the middle, or people at the bottom end giving £100 a month?

“No wonder the Treasury is in the mess it’s in – they made this decision without knowing themselves where half of all giving comes from.”

Hayday writes to FT and Telegraph

Separately, Charity Bank chief executive Malcolm Hayday has written to the FT and the Daily Telegraph to argue that the government’s stated rationale for the cap ignores how charitable donations are used.

He wrote: “As a charity ourselves, we have many donors and investors who benefit from tax relief. We then lend their money to small or medium-sized charities and community enterprises throughout the United Kingdom, many of which could not do their vital work for society without such help.

“A study on what is achieved by charities and community enterprises we support, using the government’s own formula, showed an average £7 return to society for every £1 foregone by the Exchequer.

“If this is more than the government can achieve from spending the tax, we should encourage more use of tax reliefs for charity, rather than limiting it.”


Tom Jones
16 Apr 2012

“very simple, high-level analysis, because we don’t have the details we need”

so a guess then

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

DEC Nepal Earthquake Appeal total reaches £38m

5 May 2015

The Disasters Emergency Committee has today announced that it has raised £38m since the launch of its...

Top 50 most influential survey 2015 now open

5 May 2015

Fundraising Magazine’s 50 Most Influential poll is open for voting for the next six weeks.

NSPCC announced as official partner for Virgin London Marathon 2016

1 May 2015

The NSPCC has targeted raising £2.3m in the Virgin London Marathon 2016 after being named today as the...

Less than half of people believe charity chief executives should be paid

5 May 2015

Fewer than one in two members of the public believe that the chief executives of charities should be paid...

Former Royal Horticultural Society head of operations admits attempting to defraud the charity of £700,000

1 May 2015

The former head of operations at the Royal Horticultural Society, pleaded guilty to one count of fraud...

Boycott Workfare encourages people to ‘name and shame’ charities involved in workfare

1 May 2015

Campaign group Boycott Workfare is encouraging activists to report to them any charities and organisations...

Two-thirds of donors uncomfortable with giving online, says poll

30 Apr 2015

Just one third of people said they were comfortable with donating money online, with fewer happy to donate...

Charities 'need a complete culture change' for digital transformation, says report

24 Apr 2015

Digital teams need to develop better relationships with colleagues in IT and elsewhere in the organisation...

Comic Relief launches grants programme for digital projects

24 Apr 2015

Comic Relief has launched Tech for Good, a new grants programme to help charities run digital projects...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance