One small gift aid allowance per charity – not per branch, says HMRC

One small gift aid allowance per charity – not per branch, says HMRC

One small gift aid allowance per charity – not per branch, says HMRC3

Finance | Jonathan Last | 30 Apr 2012

The HMRC has stressed that under its new gift aid small donations scheme, a charity will get one £5,000 top-up allowance only, regardless of whether it is broken up into regional branches.

Members of HMRC met with representatives from the charity sector on Friday to discuss this and other “design issues” outlined in its Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme Consultation Document, published on 27 March.

The document aims to find “the balance between fairness and complexity” in the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s proposal to enable charities to claim a top-up payment equivalent to gift aid on up to £5,000 of small donations they collect each year. HMRC is welcoming feedback from the sector to iron out the details of the scheme.

One thing that the HMRC states in its consultation document, and reiterated at Friday’s meeting, is that it “wants to prevent organisations that are a single charity from fragmenting into smaller organisations in order to access more small gift aid (GASDS) payments”. This would also apply to those who have such a structure already in place for historic reasons, and presents a distinct “design challenge”. For example, the Roman Catholic church is one national charity, but each Church of England parish is its own charity. 

“Some charities that carry out charitable activities in local communities operate through local groups that are registered charities in their own right,” the document states under the heading ‘policy design considerations’. “If the government simply allocated a £5,000 maximum limit for donations to each recognised charity, these groups would receive a greater number of allocations than other charities that may have a more centralised structure with local groups or branches that form part of the same charity.”

The document shows that HMRC is trying to find ways to ensure that some charities are not disadvantaged by their structure. Splitting the allowance or allocating a ‘lead charity’ were some of the possible ways to counter such fragmentation discussed at Friday's meeting.

Discussions at the meeting

Cathy Wilson, policy team leader for HMRC Charities and Nick Jones, policy adviser, chaired the Westminster meeting and fielded questions from representatives of a range of charities that have an interest in the scheme.

The agenda of the two-hour consultation session primarliy covered the abovementioned ‘connected charities’ issue and two other main points that the HMRC was seeking opinions on: matching (a proposal designed to prevent abuse of the scheme, wherein a charity must match – either exactly or to a set degree – their small donation claim to their gift aid claim) and community buildings, a proposal to add an extra £5,000 limit for charities for each community building it collects donations in, regardless of how many different individual groups fundraise within that building.

Answering questions from the floor, HMRC emphasised that the GASDS would require evidence, but specifics of this would be decided as consultation progressed. It was only for UK taxpayers, so the issue of students and foreign donators (such as tourists visiting a church and putting money in the collection plate) needs to be dealt with; inspections for GASDS will largely reflect those for gift aid; and the scheme is designed to be for physical, spontaneous donations only – ruling out text and online giving.

“This policy is about spontaneous giving – such as putting a few coins in a bucket or collection tray – where someone could have given a gift aid declaration, but administratively it was not convenient or practical either to the donor or that charity itself,” summarised Wilson.

Explanation of small gift aid

GASDS, intended to be introduced from 6 April 2013 with no fixed end date, is designed to help charities and community amateur sports clubs to claim a ‘gift aid-style’ payment on donations made in situations where donors either don’t or won’t give their details – such as bucket collections or a plate passed around during religious services – in the way required by the existing gift aid scheme. The scheme will only apply to small donations of £20 (raised at Budget 2012 from the previously-stated limit of £10).

Unlike gift aid, GASDS is not a tax relief and payments through it are not repayments of tax; instead it will be funded through public expenditure and legislated separately from HMRC’s current annual Finance Bill process. It is not, HMRC stressed, a replacement for gift aid, rather a concurrent scheme, designed to help smaller charities to get the same benefits as larger organisations. HMRC will, however, administer claims in the same way that it does for gift aid claims – so the full £5,000 figure would actually top up by another £1,250.

Since GASDS would have fewer records, it raises the issue of possible fraud and abuse. Therefore HMRC spoke of certain eligibility criteria that a charity would need to fulfil: it would need to have at least a three-year record of good compliance with gift aid and to keep this standard up during its participation in GASDS (this means that GASDS will not apply to ‘pop up’ charities that are born out of a specific event, until they are at least three years old and have proved their compliance). Claims on the scheme will be based on the tax year from 6 April, regardless of which quarter the particular charity files its accounts, and will need to be made within one year of the end of the tax year in which the small donations are collected.

The full consultation document, which includes a more in-depth explanation of the GASDS, is available on the HRMC’s website here.

The scheme is only at the proposal stage, and the government will consult on this draft guidance later this year, taking into account the reaction of the voluntary sector, before finalising it for the 2013/14 financial year. The closing date for comments is 25 May 2012.

Mike Wade
Director of Fundraising and Communications
1 May 2012

As a trustee of a number of small charities, my concern is that the government has allowed what could have been a great opportunity for small charities to be completely strangled by red tape. They claim that the scheme is "designed to help smaller charities to get the same benefits as larger organisations". Yet by introducing a requirement for small charities to have a 3 year track record of compliance with the exisiting Gift Aid scheme, they are exluding the many thousands of small charities, run by hard pressed volunteers, who find Gift Aid too challenging or scary, and had high hopes of this initiave. They have been let down.

Please - time for a rethink on this. The bean counters can always find potential risks that can be covered off with yet more red tape. Let's cut the small charities some slack here and Get Britain Giving .

Richard King
Head of Charities & Schools
Tozers LLP
30 Apr 2012

I bashed off my earlier reply before absorbing the whole article. When I did so I realised the full implications of what it was saying: that HMRC were (apparently) seriously considering treating groups of separately registered and managed charities in the same sector as if they were one. That is clearly preposterous.

How on earth can HMRC decide which are autonomous charities and which are not?! Doubtless the burden would be on the poor old charity to prove it is separate from any other. Frankly who would want to go to the trouble and expense of fragmenting their charity just to gain multiple £5000 allowances? It seems madness, and totally impractical.

Richard King
Head of Charities & Schools
Tozers LLP
30 Apr 2012

A useful update, thanks, but the RC/CofE analogy is false in that to say that "the Roman Catholic church is one national charity" is wrong. That Church may look like a single entity (with a national charity serving the Catholic Bishops' Conference based in London) but it is manifested locally in at least one charity for each diocese in England and Wales (Scotland being a separate Conference). These and many other Catholic charities (including religious orders) are represented by members of the Conference of Solicitors for Catholic Charities (CSCC, which I happen to chair);


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Think tank Rogare calls for a fourth fundraising regulatory body to set code of practice

30 Jun 2015

Fundraising think tank Rogare has today called upon the minister for civil society to create a fourth,...

Amendments proposed to Charities Bill to make all fundraising charities with income over £1m join FRSB

30 Jun 2015

Fundraising charities with incomes over £1m would have to join the FRSB, according to amendments proposed...

Friends of the Earth writes to every supporter after Olive Cooke affair

29 Jun 2015

Friends of the Earth has written to registered supporters to ask if they were happy with the way the charity...

Breast Cancer Now loses a quarter of its staff after merger

30 Jun 2015

Breast Cancer Now has reduced staff numbers by a quarter since the merger, through a mix of redundancy...

Charity ordered to seek advice on reclaiming £130,000 missing funds from former trustee

30 Jun 2015

A charity has been ordered to seek independent advice on reclaiming £130,000 of missing income after...

Trustees must answer to the public over high chief executive pay, says minister for civil society

29 Jun 2015

Trustees must do more to give the public confidence in charities, and must make sure charitable donations...

Contactless donations set to soar, CAF study suggests

24 Jun 2015

There is a “massive future” for charity donations using contactless payment technology, according...

RBG Kew denies pressuring TripAdvisor into deleting hundreds of negative reviews

22 Jun 2015

Kew Gardens has denied claims that it pressured travel site TripAdvisor into deleting negative reviews...

JK Rowling charity scoops top prize at Charity Awards 2015

19 Jun 2015

A charity set up by JK Rowling ten years ago to close children’s institutions and orphanages in developing...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button