Share

Salesforce says sector is confused about its 'social enterprise' trademark

Salesforce says sector is confused about its 'social enterprise' trademark
News

Salesforce says sector is confused about its 'social enterprise' trademark

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 20 Aug 2012

Global software firm Salesforce has opened dialogue with the social enterprise sector about its plans to trademark the term 'social enterprise', calling those who object to its move "confused".

In response, Peter Holbrook, chief executive of Social Enterprise UK (SEUK), warns that if Salesforce continues with its application, it will lead to legislation, here and abroad, to make social enterprise a legal entity.

In an email, seen by civilsociety.co.uk, Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce, has written a short message to all those who have contacted Salesforce about its application to trademark the term 'social enterprise'.

Benioff starts his message: “Hi, I think someone must be confused.”

He goes on to explain that Salesforce has applied to trademark the term ‘social enterprise’ in connection with enterprise software only, and is not seeking to use the phrase social enterprise generally.

To emphasize his point, Benioff writes ‘social enterprise’ and ‘enterprise software’ in capital letters.

Benioff, who in his message takes credit for inventing the term 'social enterprise,' also insists that Salesforce has no intention of stopping others from using the phrase in unrelated fields such as philanthropy, social responsibility or community involvement: “Our work with non-profits globally over the last decade speaks for itself,” he says. “Whoever wants to discuss this with me can contact me on my personal email ceo@salesforce.com.”

Benioff signs off his email with the Hawaiian word for goodbye ‘Aloha’.

Legal definition for social enterprise

Peter Holbrook, chief executive of SEUK, has written back to Benioff, saying it and fellow campaigners are “confused” about his claim that Salesforce only wants to trademark the term ‘social enterprise’ in connection with enterprise software only:

“Many of us have read your application and it is very wide and varied in the products it describes, but I will take legal advice on this. I would like to get back to you on this once my lawyer has advised,” says Holbrook.

He adds: “You say that you are only using the term social enterprise to describe the software you make. Yet many of your corporate communications materials directly say that by buying into your campaign/method/product, businesses are ‘becoming’ social enterprises.”

Holbrook says that if Salesforce persists in misappropriating the term social enterprise, it will lead to a legal definition of social enterprise in the UK and abroad: “There are politicians in many countries including the UK already pressing for this to happen to protect the good name of ‘social enterprise’. It will certainly happen if you persist with your confusing use of our name and your attempts to legally appropriate it.”

Social Enterprise UK say Salesforce marketing for its Dreamforce 12 conference repeatedly refers to firms such as Virgin and Burberry, as ‘social enterprises.’

It has formally written to Richard Branson of Virgin and Angela Ahrendts of Burberry who are due to speak at Salesforce’s Dreamforce 12 conference in San Francisco later this year, to inform them of their concerns.

Salesforce is seeking to trademark the term ‘social enterprise’ in the US, Jamaica and Europe. In response, Social Enterprise UK has mounted a campaign on Twitter entitled #notinourname.

A number of charities and social enterprises, including SEUK, use Salesforce software. NCVO members receive a 5 per cent discount on Salesforce fundraising software.

The Not In Our Name campaign, being led by Social Enterprise UK on behalf of the movement, aims to:

1. To ensure that Salesforce’s attempts to trademark use of the term ‘social enterprise’ in the EU (including the UK) is not successful.
2. To persuade Salesforce to desist from applying for further trademarks and putting ‘TM’ next to the words social enterprise in its external communications as it has no trademark or trademark pending – this is misleading.
3. To raise awareness of real social enterprise – what it means, what the movement is trying to achieve, and to get more people supporting it.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Shadow minister wades in to Big Society Network funding controversy

22 May 2013

Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas has tabled a series of Parliamentary questions to minister...

National abuse charity told it will not receive Jimmy Savile Trust funds

22 May 2013

The trustees of the Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust are not donating any funds to the National Association...

Commission moots indicating FRSB membership on charity register

22 May 2013

Charities’ membership or non-membership of the Fundraising Standards Board could be included on the...

Big Society Network's 2012 accounts show £180k deficit

23 May 2013

Big Society Network has finally filed its 2012 accounts with Companies House, nearly five months late,...

New CRB body to launch 'time-saving' checking process in June

23 May 2013

The Disclosure and Barring Service, which has replaced CRB checks, has announced details of its new Update...

Help for Heroes offers condolences to murdered soldier's family

23 May 2013

Help for Heroes has expressed its “deep sadness” about the murder of a soldier in south London who...

Age UK and London Zoo on shortlist for £2m Google charity competition

22 May 2013

Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance