Share

Charities Act gets vote of approval from charity law experts

Baroness Howe of Idlicote, chair of the NCVO Charity Law Review Advisory Group
News

Charities Act gets vote of approval from charity law experts

Governance | Tania Mason | 16 May 2012

The Charities Act 2006 has, overall, proved to be a good piece of legislation that is fit for purpose, the NCVO Charity Law Review Advisory Group has concluded.

Even subjects that have sparked heated debate, such as payment of trustees or the status of the Charity Commission, are, upon closer inspection, "dealt with by the law in a satisfactory manner”, the Group said in their submission to Lord Hodgson’s official review of the Act.

“Rather it is other factors, such as the economic downturn, the recent budget announcements and the public service contracting environment, that are of far greater concern,” they concluded.

However, the group did make some recommendations to improve the legal and regulatory framework for charities. These included:

  • The government, the devolved administrations, the sector’s three regulators and HMRC should try to agree a “single definition of charity and a single public benefit requirement for the whole of the UK, which would also apply for tax purposes”.
  • Further legislation is “highly desirable” to clarify the law on public benefit, “but this should not be an attempt to produce a comprehensive definition of the public benefit requirement”.
  • There should be a full consultation on the possible creation of a charities Ombudsman and the details of how it should operate.
  • The Charity Commission should publish statistics about the number of individual trustees who have been required to make payments to their charity because they breached their trustee duties. This should help to reassure prospective trustees about the level of risk involved in the role.
  • Funders with an interest in governance should undertake further research into whether paying trustees helps with recruitment, diversity and improved governance.
  • The Charity Commission, HMRC and Companies House should co-ordinate the type of information they ask for, and end the current duplication of reporting requirements. “In particular, all regulators should take steps to adopt the same type of software in order to enable the standardisation of data collected”. This should be fit fir purpose for all types of charity, and affordable.
  • Self-regulation of fundraising is working, but stronger sanctions are desirable. A full consultation should be carried out to explore various options and their implications; a model similar to the Advertising Standards Authority should be considered in particular. But financial penalties should only be introduced as a last resort, because of the detriment caused to the charity and the fact it is donors’ money at stake.
  • The inherent unfairness of the current public collections regime needs to be addressed so that charities are not disadvantaged compared with commercial collectors. 
  • The Charity Commission’s core public benefit guidance should be much simpler and shorter.
  • Public benefit reporting should be extended to all exempt and excepted charities to improve accountability.

Charity Commission funding and independence

Regarding the funding of the Charity Commission, the group decided no other funding model is more appropriate than the one currently in place.

It said it hoped that the current tight budget would be reviewed as soon as economic conditions allowed, but that in the meantime it is “not appropriate or advisable for the Commission to implement money-raising strategies such as one-off charges or the introduction of penalties”.

The group also specifically considered the Charity Commission’s independence from government, acknowledging that certain media have portrayed its current chair, Dame Suzi Leather, as having close links to the Labour government that appointed her to the role.

But it concluded that “such portrayals are inherent in any high-profile appointment, where the incumbent’s political leanings or previous activities may be juxtaposed with the responsibilities of the current job”, and added there is no hard evidence that the Commission does not operate independently from government.

The advisory group is chaired by Baroness Howe of Idlicote (pictured). The other members are:

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Major donors are often ‘badly handled’ by fundraisers, according to NPC

1 Jul 2016

High net worth individuals and philanthropists are often “badly handled” by fundraisers, who lack...

Commission on the Donor Experience launches, outlines 25 focus areas

1 Jul 2016

The Commission on the Donor Experience has announced the 25 areas of fundraising that it will focus on...

Fundraising Regulator rejected by Scotland in favour of self-regulation

30 Jun 2016

The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations has rejected extending the remit of the Fundraising Regulator...

Commission opens consultation into use of official warning power

1 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission is looking for responses to its proposals of how it will use its new power of issuing...

Scottish applications for charitable status rose by 7 per cent, OSCR accounts reveal

1 Jul 2016

The total number of registered charities in Scotland has risen by 7 per cent to 24,055, according to the...

Charity Commission investigates 72 RAF mess charities

1 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission has launched an investigation into 72 Royal Air Force mess charities, following...

Lack of understanding of technology is a barrier to social change

1 Jul 2016

The voluntary sector’s poor understanding of the potential technology could have is one of the barriers...

Marie Curie appoints digital advisory board

21 Jun 2016

Marie Curie has appointed a digital advisory board to help it build on the successes of its digital transformation...

'Fake' charity app to help migrants at sea has been removed by Apple

21 Jun 2016

An app that claimed to support a charity rescuing refugees in the Mediterranean by enabling users to search...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance