Alun Michael suggests there is too much duplication in charity sector 2

Finance | Celina Ribeiro | 9 Jun 2011

The chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on the Voluntary Sector prompted a vehement defence of small charities by sector representatives after he expressed concern at the amount of duplication within the sector.

Alun Michael, a Labour and Co-operative Party MP, told the APPG yesterday in the House of Commons that he had reservations about the “enormous amount of duplication within the charity sector”.

He went further to say that “a violent incident in a family frequently results in a trust being set up” and that many of these trusts and charities end up having little impact on their intended cause.

His comments sparked a prompt reply from NCVO’s Karl Wilding, Beth Breeze of the University of Kent and Community Foundation Network chair Matthew Bowcock, all of whom defended the work and number of small charities operating in the UK.

Bowcock said that while he does see a lot of replication in the sector, “actually, you have to let a thousand flowers bloom” and that when charities cease to provide benefit, they should be – and are - rolled up. He suggested that forcing small charities to merge could dilute the passion which propels those leading the small organisations.

Wilding also piped in with a defence, arguing that “stories of duplication have been slightly overdone”.

Breeze followed, arguing that such sentiments “underestimate the charity sector and that’s not helpful”.

She said that there is already a high level of collaboration, resource-sharing and cooperation among small charities, but that it is not often known or recognised by the public and public figures.

Directory: Community Foundation Network | National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

Place a comment

Carl Allen
9 Jun 2011

Too many small businesses means duplication, loss of economy of scale and so on.

[Reply]

Gordon Hunter
Director
Lincolnshire Community Foundation
9 Jun 2011

You might as well say
"there's too many political parties: a coalition works better!"

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.