Share

Shaw Trust paid nearly £1m in severance packages last financial year

Sally Burton, chief executive
News

Shaw Trust paid nearly £1m in severance packages last financial year 1

Finance | Tania Mason | 19 Apr 2011

The Shaw Trust paid out £915,000 in severance payments during 2009/10 to 15 employees who earned salaries of £60,000 or more, its latest annual report reveals.

The ‘emoluments’ table on page 30 of the report shows that one employee was paid a total package, including salary, bonuses, benefits-in-kind, car allowance, payments in lieu of notice and redundancy, of between £210,000 and £220,000.

Two people took home total packages, including severance payments, of £190,000 to £200,000, and one person each was paid between £170,000 and £180,000, and £130,000 to £140,000.

The charity confirmed to Civil Society that in total, 15 employees whose total emoluments exceeded £60,000 did receive redundancy and/or payments in lieu of notice, and the total amount of these payments was £915,000. This was a large jump from the year before, when just £95,000 was paid out in severance payments.

The Trust declined to provide details of which staff were made redundant and why.  A spokeswoman said: “Not all of these were senior staff and we do not think it appropriate for specific information regarding the emoluments of individuals to be placed in the public domain.

“The reasons that the individual staff members were made redundant are varied.”

When chief executive Sally Burton (pictured) joined the Trust in late 2009, she instigated a new strategy and set about hiring lots of new talent in the top team. When Civil Society interviewed her in February 2010, she had already moved former retail director Nick Mason into a new role of director of business and performance and made Stuart Knowles, previously in charge of programmes as director of employment, the new chief operating officer.  But several key roles remained filled by interims; chief financial officer, commercial director, director of workforce and organisational development and head of retail.  Most of these appointments were made by June last year.

The Shaw Trust had record income during the year of £96.6m, up from £81m the previous year.  It employed 2,552 people (averaged throughout the year), virtually unchanged from 2009 (2,562 staff).  However, its wages bill rose significantly – from £47.5m in 2009 to £53.7m in 2010.

For the third year running, the Trust featured in the Top 100 Employers Guide sponsored by the Corporate Research Foundation. It was also ranked 41st in the Stonewall Workplace Equality Index, up six places from the year before.
 

Nigel Edward-Few
Chief Executive
20 Apr 2011

How dare the Shaw Trust decline to provide details of which staff were made redundant and why and “Not all of these were senior staff and we do not think it appropriate for specific information regarding the emoluments of individuals to be placed in the public domain".

Does it not occur to said spokesperson that the Shaw Trust is not a private company but a public charity dependent on the generosity and support of their supporters who have a right to know such details? Shouldn't the Charity Commission not have a right to know also?

She also says, “The reasons that the individual staff members were made redundant are varied.” There are only three significant reasons for redundancy - a lack of funding for the posts concerned, an unreasonable relocation requirement or related to the second perhaps, that the role in which the person worked or a significant part of it is no longer required. All of these are legitimate and should be published.

I am getting fed up with yet another passive pay off scandal. When is this going to stop? How many more such situations will cause a diminution of confidence in our sector?

If said terminations are outside of this, why was their employment discontinued - was it that their faces no longer fitted, were they dimissed for misconduct or incompetence? If so, then they were not redundant.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance