Sector umbrella bodies co-operate on letter to council leaders

Finance | Tania Mason | 28 Mar 2011

NCVO, Navca and Acevo have written a joint letter to all council chief executives asking them to explain how they are applying the three ‘tests of reasonableness’ outlined by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles, in their relationships with their local voluntary sector.

Pickles used his speech to the NCVO annual conference on 1 March to threaten local authorities with “statutory powers” if he deemed they weren’t treating their voluntary sector partners with fairness and respect. He outlined three tests of “reasonable” behaviour: not cutting more from sector budgets then they cut from their own; talking to voluntary groups at an early stage about how services might need to changes, and giving sector partners at least three months notice of changes to their contract or grant.

The letter to the local authorities asks the council leaders to explain how they see the two sectors working together locally in the tighter fiscal environment.

Kevin Curley (pictured), chief executive of Navca, said there are enough councils engaged in constructive dialogue with their local sector to suggest that it should be possible everywhere. He has recently written separately to the leaders of Chelmsford and Reading Borough Councils to thank them for increasing voluntary sector grants budgets next year and congratulating them on their leadership.

Curley told Civil Society it was important to highlight the pockets of excellent practice that do exist, "when so much of the focus is on cuts". He has also written to ministers Eric Pickles, Greg Clark and Nick Hurd to tell them about the good work these councils have done and about Navca’s recognition of their significance.

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) | National Association of Voluntary and Community Action | National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)
Who's Who: Kevin Curley

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.