NCVO devises plan to 'rescue' Big Society 1

Finance | Niki May Young | 14 Feb 2011

The National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) has launched a seven-point action plan aimed at saving the Big Society concept in the face of "bad press".

Confronting the barrage of negative publicity the Conservatives' flagship project has received, the NCVO's 'How to rescue the Big Society' plan calls for the government to double the transition fund, extending its scope and scale; modernise and simplify gift aid; and support local government in making long-term strategic decisions, among its recommendations.

Launching the action plan Sir Stuart Etherington, NCVO chief executive (pictured), said: "Big Society has had a bad press this week but our recommendations make clear there are ways for bringing it back from the brink.

"By taking heed of these recommendations it could signal loud and clear that it wants to support voluntary and community organisations to play their full part in delivering the Big Society."

The NCVO's plan was published just as Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a speech this morning promising that it is his "mission in politics" to ensure the Big Society succeeds. He said: "I'm going to fight for it every day, because the Big Society is here to stay."

The NCVO action plan also calls for the government to get behind the private members' bill on public services which will ensure that public service procurement focuses on the social and environmental impact of service provision as well as the financial value of the service. The Bill was tabled by Conservative MP Chris White.

The final recommendations are for an investigation into the feasibility of lifetime legacies as a means of encouraging philanthropy in the UK; for the government to stimulate the social investment market by putting the right tax incentives in place; and for the issue of irrecoverable VAT, which allows tax breaks for private sector organisations but not charities on shared services, to be addressed.

"Now is the time to act," warned Sir Stuart, "otherwise there's a real risk that the organisations at the very heart of Big Society will not survive long enough to see the vision become a reality."

Directory: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)
Who's Who: Sir Stuart Etherington

Place a comment

Joe Saxton
Driver of Ideas
nfpSynergy
15 Feb 2011

If Lifetime Legacies are such an important giving tool then why didn't NCVO do more than give them a passing mention in their recently published Funding Commission. Lifetime Legacies may well be important but CAF, NCVO, and others have banged on and on about lifetime legacies without doing the research to demonstrate their importance in the UK and without gaining any substantive support from the fundraising community. Indeed a quick google this morning shows little recent research except an EAPG meeting where the only charity representative from CRUK said that they found that they are 'less clear about the benefits for individuals' of lifetime legacies. Please can we have some decent evidence before we put this one form of giving innovative centre stage to the government

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.