Share

Refugee Council services 'decimated' by cuts

Refugee Council services 'decimated' by cuts
News

Refugee Council services 'decimated' by cuts 5

Finance | Tania Mason | 27 Jan 2011

The Refugee Council is facing sweeping reductions to its budgets for frontline services as a result of Home Office spending cuts.

Jonathan Ellis, the Refugee Council’s policy chief, said this week that the charity’s services to beneficiaries were being “decimated” by the scale of the reduction in its Home Office settlement for 2011 and beyond.

The charity confirmed that the funding offered by the Home Office from April this year for its frontline ‘One Stop Service’ will be no more than £2.02m, which is 61.7 per cent less than for 2010/11. For its Wraparound Initial Accommodation Services, funding will be no more than £726,000, which is 49.6 per cent lower than for 2010/11. 

The contract for its Refugee Integration and Employment Service (RIES) will also end in September 2011.

Ellis said he couldn’t put a figure on the total amount of cuts expected because the charity was still negotiating with the government over its final settlement.

The charity has already had to cope with cuts of 20 per cent this financial year to its UK Border Agency contracts compared with 2009/10.  It has already made some redundancies and is consulting with staff over the next round.  It employs just under 300 staff nationally.

Heavily reliant on statutory funding

According to the Refugee Council’s 2009/10 accounts, filed with the Charity Commission this week, UK Border Agency contracts accounted for 77 per cent of its £20.1m income last year. Funding from other statutory sources totalled around £1.8m, meaning the charity is dependent upon the government for 86 per cent of its revenue.

The charity stated in its annual report: “2010/11 will be a year of exceptional uncertainty for the Refugee Council.

“Despite the fall in the number of asylum seekers coming to the UK each year, pressure on our services will continue to increase.  The increased demand across all sectors of society for access to social housing and to legal and other advice services will leave our clients with nowhere else to turn, particularly given that many of our member organisations are being hit through cuts to voluntary organisations at a local level.”

It said its greatest priority was to “continue to streamline our organisation so that money is freed up for frontline work”.

Home Office response

The Home Office also refused to disclose details of the extent of the cuts to the charity’s budget.  A spokeswoman said: “The figure requested for 2011/2012 is still subject to negotiation and we will not be able to announce next financial year’s grant funding for some time.”

Immigration minister Damian Green said: “The UK Border Agency is committed to continuing to work with voluntary sector partners. However, in the current financial climate, we all have to look for ways of doing things differently to reduce costs.

“Asylum intake has reduced significantly since grant payment agreements were first put in place. It is only right that funding is reduced accordingly to reflect this.”

The Home Office has issued a comprehensive Q&A regarding the UKBA’s approach to funding voluntary sector agencies, including the Refugee Council.  You can read the Q&A here.

Barbara
28 Jan 2011

It's very interesting how this discussion is evolving. Very instructive for me, as for a person whose first language is not English.
Really important issue is what is going to happen with Refugee Council and if an organisation of their size can't diversify their income sources what are small refugee grass-root organisations supposed to do? And all grass-root groups, for that matter?
I have to say that I donate to Refugee Council from time to time so I know they could make more effort to recruit supporters and keep them loyal (it's my pure faith that keeps me donating) and it's really something that awaits all of us.

Paul
CE
National Benevolent Inst
28 Jan 2011

If the UK were to join the EU Schengen area of states, which have no border or customs controls between those states, but rather strong border & customs controls against non EU states, then we might save 49.6% of the budget of the UK border agency and the UK customs department. That would make nuch more sense.

Howard Lake
Director
Fundraising UK Ltd
27 Jan 2011

It is true that the word's meaning is misunderstood by many people, and that it has come to be used in contrasting ways. However, surely an article focusing on numbers and percentages, and the important political background to these, should either avoid using a potentially confusing word, or adhere to its standard definition.

I note that you were quoting the Refugee Council’s policy chief, so perhaps the original error was his. To repeat that quotation in the headline of the article does not, however, help in conveying an unambiguous message.

Right, I'm off to the supermarket to see if I can persuade them to see their 10% off deals as 49.6% off deals.

Ian Townley
27 Jan 2011

I'm sorry to point this point this out and be pedantic but why are so many people referring to the services as being 'decimated'? I find it hard to believe that so many clearly intelligent people can get the meaning so wrong. I WISH the budgets were being decimated as it would only mean a 10% reduction and not the 49.6 % as mentioned in the article.

Tania Mason
Group editor
Civil society
27 Jan 2011
Response to [Ian Townley]

Hi Ian

Yes, technically you are right, but as we all know, the meaning of words evolve. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage states that the nonspecific use of this word to mean 'devastate' or 'severely reduce the numbers of' is nowadays the commonest use of the word in both British and American English.

Tania

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance