Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases
24 May 2012
Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.
The Refugee Council is facing sweeping reductions to its budgets for frontline services as a result of Home Office spending cuts.
Jonathan Ellis, the Refugee Council’s policy chief, said this week that the charity’s services to beneficiaries were being “decimated” by the scale of the reduction in its Home Office settlement for 2011 and beyond.
The charity confirmed that the funding offered by the Home Office from April this year for its frontline ‘One Stop Service’ will be no more than £2.02m, which is 61.7 per cent less than for 2010/11. For its Wraparound Initial Accommodation Services, funding will be no more than £726,000, which is 49.6 per cent lower than for 2010/11.
The contract for its Refugee Integration and Employment Service (RIES) will also end in September 2011.
Ellis said he couldn’t put a figure on the total amount of cuts expected because the charity was still negotiating with the government over its final settlement.
The charity has already had to cope with cuts of 20 per cent this financial year to its UK Border Agency contracts compared with 2009/10. It has already made some redundancies and is consulting with staff over the next round. It employs just under 300 staff nationally.
According to the Refugee Council’s 2009/10 accounts, filed with the Charity Commission this week, UK Border Agency contracts accounted for 77 per cent of its £20.1m income last year. Funding from other statutory sources totalled around £1.8m, meaning the charity is dependent upon the government for 86 per cent of its revenue.
The charity stated in its annual report: “2010/11 will be a year of exceptional uncertainty for the Refugee Council.
“Despite the fall in the number of asylum seekers coming to the UK each year, pressure on our services will continue to increase. The increased demand across all sectors of society for access to social housing and to legal and other advice services will leave our clients with nowhere else to turn, particularly given that many of our member organisations are being hit through cuts to voluntary organisations at a local level.”
It said its greatest priority was to “continue to streamline our organisation so that money is freed up for frontline work”.
The Home Office also refused to disclose details of the extent of the cuts to the charity’s budget. A spokeswoman said: “The figure requested for 2011/2012 is still subject to negotiation and we will not be able to announce next financial year’s grant funding for some time.”
Immigration minister Damian Green said: “The UK Border Agency is committed to continuing to work with voluntary sector partners. However, in the current financial climate, we all have to look for ways of doing things differently to reduce costs.
“Asylum intake has reduced significantly since grant payment agreements were first put in place. It is only right that funding is reduced accordingly to reflect this.”
The Home Office has issued a comprehensive Q&A regarding the UKBA’s approach to funding voluntary sector agencies, including the Refugee Council. You can read the Q&A here.
Paul
CE
National Benevolent Inst
28 Jan 2011
If the UK were to join the EU Schengen area of states, which have no border or customs controls between those states, but rather strong border & customs controls against non EU states, then we might save 49.6% of the budget of the UK border agency and the UK customs department. That would make nuch more sense.
Howard Lake
Director
Fundraising UK Ltd
27 Jan 2011
It is true that the word's meaning is misunderstood by many people, and that it has come to be used in contrasting ways. However, surely an article focusing on numbers and percentages, and the important political background to these, should either avoid using a potentially confusing word, or adhere to its standard definition.
I note that you were quoting the Refugee Council’s policy chief, so perhaps the original error was his. To repeat that quotation in the headline of the article does not, however, help in conveying an unambiguous message.
Right, I'm off to the supermarket to see if I can persuade them to see their 10% off deals as 49.6% off deals.
Ian Townley
27 Jan 2011
I'm sorry to point this point this out and be pedantic but why are so many people referring to the services as being 'decimated'? I find it hard to believe that so many clearly intelligent people can get the meaning so wrong. I WISH the budgets were being decimated as it would only mean a 10% reduction and not the 49.6 % as mentioned in the article.
Tania Mason
Group editor
Civil society
27 Jan 2011
Response to [Ian Townley]
Hi Ian
Yes, technically you are right, but as we all know, the meaning of words evolve. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage states that the nonspecific use of this word to mean 'devastate' or 'severely reduce the numbers of' is nowadays the commonest use of the word in both British and American English.
Tania
24 May 2012
Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.
23 May 2012
The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...
23 May 2012
A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...
24 May 2012
The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...
24 May 2012
A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...
24 May 2012
Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.
24 May 2012
Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.
24 May 2012
Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.
21 May 2012
Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
19 Nov 2012
Barbara
28 Jan 2011
It's very interesting how this discussion is evolving. Very instructive for me, as for a person whose first language is not English.
Really important issue is what is going to happen with Refugee Council and if an organisation of their size can't diversify their income sources what are small refugee grass-root organisations supposed to do? And all grass-root groups, for that matter?
I have to say that I donate to Refugee Council from time to time so I know they could make more effort to recruit supporters and keep them loyal (it's my pure faith that keeps me donating) and it's really something that awaits all of us.
[Reply]