Share

Select committee savages government's quango cull

Bernard Jenkin MP
News

Select committee savages government's quango cull

Finance | Tania Mason | 7 Jan 2011

The Public Administration Committee has slated the government’s quango cull, saying many of the functions should have been transferred to charities and mutuals rather than simply scrapped.

In a scathing report that describes the exercise as “poorly managed” and unlikely to deliver the claimed cost-savings or better accountability, the cross-party Committee advises the government to rethink the process, re-examine each body’s governance arrangements, and consider handing some of the functions over to civil society organisations.

The government should have taken much longer to review the efficiency and effectiveness of the stable of quangos than it did, according to the Committee’s chair, Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin.

The Cabinet Office failed to establish a proper procedure for departments to follow and did not consult with the organisations concerned or the public.

“It was a fantastic opportunity to help build the Big Society and save money at the same time, but it has been botched,” he said.

The report stated that the tests used by government to evaluate each public body “may have seemed superficially plausible at the outset, but are hopelessly unclear”.

In a stinging statement issued alongside the report, the Committee said that the review has highlighted the “complex and confusing landscape of UK public bodies”.

“The current system is chaotic, making it difficult to understand why different arms-length bodies exist and what these variations mean in practice.”

Bringing the functions of quangos back inside central departments is not certain to improve accountability, the Committee added.

After the report was published, Unite the Union added its voice to the criticism, saying that the Public Bodies (Reform) Bill had “all the hallmarks of being hastily-prepared and ill-thought-out”.

General secretary-designate Len McCluskey said: “The fact that the government, which has been in office for nine months, is still unable to say how much will be saved by this exercise, speaks volumes for its ability to formulate coherent policy.”

Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister, denied the review had been rushed and insisted it would save “very significantly more” than £1bn.

In total, 192 public bodies are being abolished by the coalition government.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Charity criticised after refusing to pay Ashya King’s parents' legal fees

17 Oct 2014

Kids 'n' Cancer UK has been criticised for saying it will not pay the legal fees of the family of Ashya...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Charities 'are not building relationships with donors'

17 Oct 2014

“Our donors are victims of fundraising processes,” Giles Pegram told delegates at the International...

Charity Commission won't take action against Society Network Foundation

17 Oct 2014

The Charity Commission will take no action against the trustees of Society Network Foundation, even though...

OSCR guidance outlines strong right for charities to campaign

16 Oct 2014

Guidance released today by the Scottish charity regulator on political campaigning suggests charities...

Charity Retail Association appoints new chief executive

16 Oct 2014

The Charity Retail Association has appointed Martin Blackwell, who is currently chief executive of the...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Nesta has made no grants to charities from its Impact Investments Fund

16 Oct 2014

Only 15 per cent of applications to a Nesta fund to invest in innovations to help older people, children...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance