Lord Hodgson urges review of Sorp and Trustee Act

Finance | Tania Mason | 6 Dec 2010

NCVO president Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts believes the Sorp should be shortened and the Trustee Act reviewed, in order to encourage more people to set up charitable foundations.

In a House of Lords debate on philanthropy last week, Lord Hodgson said the government should do more to support wealthy people to establish grantmaking trusts and to encourage philanthropy among 30 to 50-year-olds, “who are probably rather below par in the giving arena”.

He said there were three things the government could do: reduce the bureaucracy of reporting, review the presentation of the Trustee Act, and implement a lifetime legacies or charitable remainder trust scheme.

“The accounting Sorp has expanded year by year and could, and should, be cut back,” Lord Hodgson said.

“We should look at the Trustee Act and laws on diversification, which are more of a concern in theory than in reality, but nevertheless lead people to believe that they may lost complete control of the way their foundation they have established operates.”

He also said that establishing charitable remainder trusts, whereby people can donate money to charity but still receive an income from it while they are alive, would encourage people to be more generous during their lifetime.

Lastly, he said that in order to engage “web-savvy” 30 to 50-year-olds in giving, more creativity was needed to find ways of demonstrating what difference their donations make. He cited the new See the Difference website as an example of such innovation.

Directory: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)
Who's Who: Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.