Share

Age UK insurance under fire as couple suffer 600 per cent increase

Age UK insurance under fire as couple suffer 600 per cent increase
News

Age UK insurance under fire as couple suffer 600 per cent increase 1

Finance | Niki May Young | 29 Jul 2010

An elderly couple has raised concerns over the Age UK insurance scheme which increased their travel insurance costs by 600 per cent  following the Help the Aged and Age Concern merger.

87 year old Geoffrey Pulzer and his wife Julienne were left shocked as Geoffrey was quoted £1,002 for an annual travel insurance policy which last year cost just £168.

Age UK changed insurance provider from Liverpool Victoria to Fortis when the two charities merged earlier this year.

Speaking with Civil Society a spokesperson for Age UK said that award-winning Fortis was a trusted insurer and that as of May it became the sole provider for approximately 460,000 home, travel and car insurance policies through the combined charity:

“Following the merger of Age Concern and Help the Aged, a full review was completed to identify how to best meet customers’ needs and it was agreed that one insurer should be appointed to ensure a consistent and effective service to the merged customer base.

“Fortis was selected because of its longstanding record in providing customers with trusted products and commitment to delivering excellent service to people in later life.”

But Geoffrey is not satisfied, telling the Telegraph: “We can't understand why there is such a difference and want to know why Age UK has picked an insurance partner that offers such poor value for people our age.”

Most providers do not quote for people over 80

 

Age UK in turn advise customers renewing insurance policies to “shop around in order to get the best level of cover” and add that, “Most providers do not quote for people over the age of 80 and some companies who previously provided cover for this age group no longer do.

"Our long term pricing strategy demonstrates our commitment to providing appropriate insurance to those in later life, that they may not be able to get elsewhere."

Age UK confirmed that while they have reviewed Geoffrey's current policy, they were "unable to comment on the previous quote provided to Mr and Mrs Pulzer and therefore unable to make any direct comparison to the premium previously charged," but advised that new factors had arisen inbetween the times the policies were taken out, adding: "When assessing this risk, several factors are taken into account which will generate the premium.

"These factors include pre-existing medical conditions, age, policy type, policy duration and geographical area. Having reviewed this case we can confirm that the premium provided was based on careful consideration of all the above criteria, which was provided at the time and under went thorough risk analysis."

Carl Allen
none
none
31 Jul 2010

It seems that a comprehensive risk assessment was done for merger purposes.

But why was the risk of increased costs to some older people excluded from the business risk assessment or perhaps not made known to all and sundry?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

British Heart Foundation's Mending Broken Hearts appeal raises £25m in four years

27 May 2015

A British Heart Foundation campaign to fund new research into heart defects has raised £25m over the...

One-fifth of charities surveyed do not accept donations through their own websites

27 May 2015

Some 20 per cent of charities do not accept donations via their own websites, and 38 per cent are not...

Charities invited to participate in 24th annual Charity Shops Survey

26 May 2015

Charities with retail operations are now invited to respond to the 24th annual Charity Shops Survey, the...

Housing Bill in Queen’s Speech creates ‘worrying precedent’ for charities, says NCVO

27 May 2015

Today’s Queen’s Speech includes a Housing Bill which will force some charities to dispose of assets...

Methodist charity gives no reason for double defaulting on accounts submissions

27 May 2015

A Cornish Methodist church and registered charity has failed to give any reason for defaulting on annual...

Sir Ian Botham threatens to sue RSPB for libel

26 May 2015

Sir Ian Botham has threatened the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds with a lawsuit, claiming the...

One-fifth of charities surveyed do not accept donations through their own websites

27 May 2015

Some 20 per cent of charities do not accept donations via their own websites, and 38 per cent are not...

Children's Society and NSPCC to improve their digital services

26 May 2015

The Children's Society and NSPCC both said last week they plan to revamp digital services for young people,...

RNLI releases first charity app for the Apple Watch

26 May 2015

The Royal National Lifeboat Institution has today launched what it believes to be the first UK charity...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance