Tories tested whether trusts would help with prisoner programme costs

Finance | Celina Ribeiro | 14 Jul 2010

The Conservative Party met with various trusts and foundations early last year and asked whether, in light of the Budget deficit, they would be willing to help fund the early years of its prisoner reoffending policy until the savings started to materialise.

David Emerson (pictured), chief executive of the Association of Charitable Foundations, confirmed that 18 months ago representatives from the shadow Cabinet met with the ACF and some its members to discuss the funding of the Tories’ prisoner reoffending programme.

“There was a discussion about whether trusts might be willing to support the costs of implementing this proposed policy until the savings from reduced reoffending were felt a few years down the line, but it was no more explicit than that,” said Emerson.

The revelation indicates not only how long in advance the Conservatives were preparing for government, but will add weight to concerns held by some in the sector that charities and the voluntary sector is viewed by the new government as an alternative source of funding for central government programmes.

But the foundations made clear the boundaries in this early meeting with the Conservative representatives, said Emerson.

“Our members present indicated that this wasn’t their role, but more significantly that [the suggestion] misunderstood the scale of funding that that policy would require compared with the much smaller resources available in the group of trusts who work on penal reform issues,” he said.

“We would always have indicated that apart from the policy/principle issue, the funds of our members are tiny compared to the scale of government funding involved or required.”

Who's Who: David Emerson

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.