Schroders predicts VAT will rise to 19 per cent next year

Finance | Tania Mason | 28 Apr 2010

Schroders has predicted that VAT will rise to 19 per cent next January regardless of who wins the election; a scenario that Charity Tax Group says would cost the charity sector tens of millions of pounds.

In the same week that the Institute for Fiscal Studies has issued a damning indictment of the failure of all three political parties to tell the public the truth about the painful spending cuts that must follow the election, Schroders’ European economist Azad Zangana has pointed out that neither Labour nor the Conservatives have ruled out increasing VAT.

At a general election breakfast briefing today chaired by former Sky News business editor Michael Wilson, Zangana said: “We believe that raising VAT from its current rate of 17.5 per cent to 19 per cent would make not only a significant contribution to the black hole in the government’s budget forecast, but would also be the most efficient way of collecting revenues quickly.”

“As a result, we expect VAT to be raised to 19 per cent after the general election.” (See Schroders' calculation below).

Zangana expected the hike would be announced immediately but not implemented until January next year, a year after VAT was reinstated at 17.5 per cent. This would allow time for a temporary boost in demand for goods and services for the rest of this year and would avoid distorting the year-on-year measure.

There would be no effect on the Consumer Price Index for 2010, but Schroders has raised its CPI forecast for 2011 from 2.2 per cent to 2.8 per cent.

Serious consequences for charities

But such a rise could have serious consequences for the voluntary sector - VAT hikes hit charities disproportionately hard because they cannot recover it all, as their private sector competitors can.

Charity Tax Group carries out an ongoing survey of member charities, asking them to calculate the impact of certain scenarios, and a recent response from 60 large charities suggested that raising VAT to 19 per cent would cost them a total of just under £15m in additional irrecoverable VAT.

Aggregating this across the whole sector would put the total cost significantly higher, said CTG’s Mathieu Mori.

Mori urged more charities to complete the survey in order to gauge an even more accurate picture of the potential cost to the sector.

Mori added that CTG would strongly urge the government to take the charity situation into account if it did propose increasing VAT.

Schroders’ calculation

Schroders European economist Azad Zangana explains how the company arrived at the 19 per cent figure:

“At the Budget the Treasury assumption was that public sector net borrowing would be £166bn for 2009/10, and that the government planned to cut it to £74bn by 2014/15. This amounts to an overall reduction of £92bn over the five years.

“A total of £28bn of that has already been announced in tax hikes and spending cuts and another £20bn comes from economic growth. But this leaves a black hole of £44bn that’s missing.

“Labour has said it wants a 2:1 ratio between spending cuts and tax rises, so it will need another £8bn in tax rises in order to hit the 2:1 ratio. And £8bn is worth the equivalent of putting VAT up by 1.5 per cent.

“Even if there is a Conservative/LibDem coalition, the Conservatives will probably want to put VAT up to 20 or 21 per cent, and the LibDems are opposed to those sorts of regressive tax increases, so we think in that case19 per cent could be seen as a reasonable compromise.”

Directory: Charity Tax Group | Schroders Charities
Who's Who: Tania Mason

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.