Government should 'take a step back' on charity tax regime, say opposition parties

News

Government should 'take a step back' on charity tax regime, say opposition parties

Finance | Gareth Jones | 25 Feb 2010

The government should hold a root and branch review of the tax system for charities, according to the spokespeople for the two main opposition parties.

Speaking last night at an election debate organised by CFDG, Conservative Nick Hurd said: “I think there’s a general issue about perhaps taking a step back and looking at the various signals that the charity sector receives through the tax system at the moment.

“I’ve a feeling that over time it's got rather muddled. I’m not a Treasury minister but my first instinct is that through a desire to keep it simple there is probably a case for having an overall review of how the sector is treated through tax.”

Liberal Democrat Jenny Willott added: “Part of me thinks that if you took one element like shared services and tried to solve the VAT issue on that, then actually that might end up causing other problems elsewhere which haven’t been forseen.

“So what I would like to see is a much more holistic approach, looking at how all the interactions work and where you could produce savings.

“My gut says you could probably make quite a few changes that would effectively be revenue-neutral to the Treasury that would actually have benefits to the sector.”

Minister for the third sector Angela Smith, also at the event, emphasised that there are very few “simple measures” when it comes to tax, but said the special status for charities would certainly be protected, and that she will be discussing the issue of VAT on shared services with the Treasury.

Directory: Charity Finance Directors' Group (CFDG)
Who's Who: Angela Smith | Nick Hurd

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.