NCVO holds talks on music licensing change 2

Finance | Gareth Jones | 20 Jan 2010

NCVO met with music licensing body PPL (Phonographic Performance Ltd) last week to discuss concerns over forthcoming licensing charges for charities that play recorded music in public.

The government announced in November last year that from April charities will no longer be exempt from paying fees for music used at events and in charity shops.

However, NCVO policy support officer Elizabeth Chamberlain said PPL has no timetable for announcing the new fee structure, only that it wanted it in place before the charitable exemption is removed.

“They are still in negotiations with different parts of the sector, and we kept raising more and more issues that they need to be aware of."

She added: “We remain against the whole principle so obviously we are trying to stall things as much as possible.”

A spokesman for PPL said the fee was likely to be approximately £75 a year, but that it was dependent on responses to the body's ongoing public consultation.

He added that in response to feedback, charities would only have to pay one annual fee, rather than, as for other organisations, separate fees to PPL and the PRS (Performing Right Society).

The campaign has been gaining support in parliament, with an early day motion submitted by Tom Levitt, chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Community and Voluntary Sector, now up to 89 signatories.

Directory: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

Place a comment

C Allen
none
none
20 Jan 2010

Reads like the charity sector wanst enforced giving and not voluntary donation.

[Reply]

Stephanie Hill
Community manager
NCVO
20 Jan 2010

The discussion has started with clear reaction from small organisations:

We are a small charity with limited funds, so having to pay for music licences could put some pressure on our funding and not having music to help the healing process could make our healing less effective.

Does your organisation feel the same?'

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.