NCVO calls for sector spending to remain 'neutral'
2 Sep 2010
NCVO has made its submission to the Treasury spending review, calling on the government to ensure the...
HMRC has decided that those charities that are deemed by the Charity Commission not to be meeting the public benefit test when they are assessed, but who reorganise themselves and eventually make the grade, will not lose their tax reliefs for the period they were deemed to be failing.
Julian Smith (pictured), partner at Farrer & Co, raised the issue with the Charity Commission early last year, concerned that a judgement by the Commission that a charity is not providing public benefit could have tax implications.
“Some tax reliefs rely not just upon the institution concerned being regarded as charitable, but that it uses its property for charitable purposes,” Smith said.
“Our question for the Charity Commission was, if you judge a charity not to be using its property for charitable purposes, would it lose the tax reliefs and could the Revenue go to them and ask for several years’ worth of reliefs back?”
After receiving the question from Smith, the Commission liaised with HMRC and just before Christmas issued a joint response, effectively stating that HMRC would not seek to penalise charities that find themselves in that position.
“Luckily the Commission took it seriously and they gave the right answer,” said Smith.
“In my view it’s an unofficial concession from HMRC.”
However, if the organisation is unable to mend its ways and is removed from the Register of Charities by the Commission, HMRC is likely to take a rather different view, as outlined by BDO’s head of charities Don Bawtree in the December issue of Charity Finance.
The Commission also said that the subject of whether such charities are also allowed to keep their rates concessions, was a matter for each local authority, and that the Department for Communities and Local Government would be re-drafting its guidance to billing authorities on the charity relief next year.
Smith added: “Whether local authorities, and the guidance given to them by DCLG are as sympathetic as HMRC remains to be seen.”
HMRC confirmed to Civil Society that it had discussed with the Charity Commission the tax impact on charities in a range of circumstances, and gave the following response:
"For charities that are found to be acting within charitable aims but not currently operating for the public benefit, HMRC will follow the Charity Commission in allowing a period of transition within which the trustees can draw up and implement an action plan to bring the charity’s activities within the definition of public benefit.
"If the trustees do not act to bring the charity’s activities within public benefit requirements HMRC will review the circumstances in each case to determine whether tax relief is still available.
"For charities that are found to be acting outside their expressed charitable aims and not providing public benefit, HMRC will carry out a review of the circumstances to assess whether any tax liability arises, as would be the case for any charity that was found to be acting outside its charitable aims in any other circumstances."
See here for Julian Smith’s comprehensive explanation of the issue and the Charity Commission’s response.
More public benefit guidance unveiled
17 Dec 2008
Commission issues more public benefit examples
24 Mar 2009
Three charities fail public benefit test
13 Jul 2009
Faith groups dominate public benefit responses
1 Sep 2007
Charities have five years to satisfy Charity Commission on public benefit
7 Oct 2009
Charities start talks on public benefit with Charity Commission
14 Oct 2009
Scottish public benefit failures now on track to meet test
25 Nov 2009
No public benefit, no tax relief
30 Nov 2009
Charity Commission to assess public benefit of the Royal Opera House
4 Dec 2009
Public benefit and tax - pain deferred
12 Jan 2010
Technical briefing: PAYE penalties
3 Mar 2010
HMRC tightens its grip
1 Jun 2010
2 Sep 2010
NCVO has made its submission to the Treasury spending review, calling on the government to ensure the...
2 Sep 2010
The proposed ‘graduate tax’ on university alumni could have a devastating impact on the growing philanthropic...
1 Sep 2010
The Big Lottery Fund will see a shift in senior management by the end of the year, it has announced.
2 Sep 2010
NCVO has made its submission to the Treasury spending review, calling on the government to ensure the...
1 Sep 2010
Newsreader Jon Snow and cricketer Andrew Flintoff are among the names lending their support to the Charity...
1 Sep 2010
Acevo chief executive Stephen Bubb has written a stern letter to the CEOs of the top 50 fundraising charities...
1 Sep 2010
Bullying UK will continue “for the next couple of months” after finding a number of potential funders...
1 Sep 2010
Marketing messages on organisations’ own websites and non-paid-for material on social networks will...
24 Aug 2010
The Internet Advertising Bureau has teamed up with Oxfam and Shelter to offer a search marketing toolkit...
18 Oct 2010
18 Oct 2010
18 Oct 2010
18 Nov 2010
18 Nov 2010
Charity Finance Bundle
Price: £295.95
Save £146.00
£149.95
BUY NOW
Charity Finance magazine
from £97.00
BUY NOW
Accounts Compliance Checklist 2010
from £45.00
BUY NOW
Charity Finance Yearbook 2010
from £49.95
BUY NOW
David Sturt
Finance Director
Bankers Benevolent Fund
13 Jan 2010
I have always understood that bodies do not have to be Registered Charities to qualify for tax relief so long as they apply their funds for Charitable pusposes. Is that not so.
If so how does any action of the Charity Commission applying its limited definition of public benefit make any difference to these bodies. Clearly another opportunity to make the legal profession rich!
[Reply]