Share

Tribunal overturns Commission judgement for the first time

Tribunal overturns Commission judgement for the first time
News

Tribunal overturns Commission judgement for the first time

Finance | Gareth Jones | 14 Oct 2009

The First-tier Tribunal (Charity) has overturned the Charity Commission’s decision to remove Nagendram Seevaratnam from his trustee position at the South London-based temple Sivayogam.

In its second case, the Tribunal (presided over by Alison McKenna, pictured) found that none of the Commission’s seven grounds for dismissing Seevaratnam were sufficient to justify the decision.

The Commission had claimed that Seevaratnam had not done enough to disassociate himself from rumours that he was a supporter of the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, but the Tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence that these rumours existed or were taken seriously.

With regard to the Commission’s concerns about the charity’s procedures for selecting and monitoring funding recipients in Sri Lanka, the Tribunal said it was unclear whether the Commission’s requirements were a legal duty of the trustees or merely best practice.

It added that it was “most concerned” that significant evidence submitted by Seevaratnam on this issue had not even been translated and as a result was not considered.

The Tribunal also found that while there had been misconduct in the acquisition of a temple in Wembley, North West London, and in pursuing various litigation cases, these were not sufficient to justify Seevaratnam’s removal as a trustee.

And while the Tribunal said it could understand the Commission’s concerns over the charity’s financial model, which allowed for its dependence on short-term, interest-free loans, this could have been resolved at an earlier stage via discussions with trustees and guidance.

Case delayed

Seevaratnam’s appeal was first posted in May 2008 but was repeatedly delayed as he struggled to find pro bono legal representation.

Seevaratnam was suspended by the Commission in 2007, with the removal made permanent the following year.

The parties now have 14 days to make representations on whether the Tribunal should award costs against the Commission.

A spokesman for the Charity Commission said it would publish an inquiry report in due course.

“As the public would expect, the Charity Commission takes concerns about abuse and mismanagement of charities extremely seriously, particularly concerning allegations of links with terrorist organisations and financial mismanagement.

“Once we have had the opportunity to consider the judgement in detail we will be in a position to give a fuller response.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Saxton spearheads lobby effort for lottery reform

9 Feb 2012

A group of charity and lottery company representatives have agreed to work on a plan to push for reform...

People give with their hearts, not their heads, warns top economist

8 Feb 2012

Charities should be wary of regaling donors with too many facts and figures about the impact of their...

United Way-style matchmaking service to launch in London

8 Feb 2012

London Voluntary Service Council plans to use the money it won from the Transforming Local Infrastructure...

London Mayor opens social enterprise support centre

9 Feb 2012

A new headquarters and hub for social enterprise support organisations has officially opened in London...

Christian Aid dumps head of fundraising role

8 Feb 2012

Christian Aid has “disestablished” its head of fundraising role as part of a new approach to fundraising...

Health committee recommends joined-up social care commissioning

8 Feb 2012

The key to securing better outcomes for older people and other vulnerable groups is joined-up services,...

Wellcome Trust to give employees more choice over IT devices

9 Feb 2012

The Wellcome Trust plans to give its employees more choice over the type of device they use for work.

Animal charity shifts fundraising priority from legacies to online

6 Feb 2012

An East Sussex-based animal welfare charity has launched a new website in a bid to increase online donations...

4Children reveals new website

31 Jan 2012

4Children has launched its new website to provide clearer information about its work and campaigns as...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance