Share

Three charities fail public benefit test

Three charities fail public benefit test
News

Three charities fail public benefit test

Finance | Gareth Jones | 13 Jul 2009

Three out of twelve charities have failed the Charity Commission’s initial public benefit assessments - two independent schools and one fee-charging care home.

Highfield Priory School, St Anselm’s School Trust and Penylan House Jewish Retirement and Nursing Home have been told their trustees have 12 months to come up with an action plan as they do not provide enough opportunity for those who cannot afford the fees to benefit.

Another care home, the Rest Bay Convalescent Hotel, has been told the benefits it provides are not sufficiently related to its aims, as it mainly provides holidays, and therefore the Commission was unable to form a judgement. It will either have to change its activities or amend its aims.

The remaining eight charities taking part in the first set of assessments, comprising another three independents schools, another care home and four charities for the advancement of religion are all providing sufficient public benefit, though five have been given good practice recommendations.

The Commission has also published its Emerging Findings report with additional information for trustees about meeting the public benefit requirement.

Schools chief criticises focus on bursaries

The Independent Schools Council said it was “highly concerned about the implications” of the decision on the two unsuccessful schools.

“We are deeply disappointed with the approach taken by the Charity Commission, which focuses on the amount of means-tested bursaries provided by each school”, said its chief executive David Lyscom (pictured).

“School charities are not-for-profit enterprises, run by governing bodies to cover costs while maintaining a prudent level of reserves. 

“The implication of the Commission’s findings appears to be that many schools must now aim to provide a significant – but still unspecified – proportion of their turnover in full bursaries. 

“This will inevitably lead to fee increases for the vast majority of parents, putting the benefits of an independent education beyond the reach of a greater number of children.

“In focusing on bursaries, the Commission have not only downplayed the significance of partnerships with local schools and communities, but also deliberately discounted the wider social benefits that individual schools and the independent sector as a whole provide.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close ยป

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance