Share

Charity Tribunal dismisses Catholic adoption case

Charity Tribunal dismisses Catholic adoption case
News

Charity Tribunal dismisses Catholic adoption case

Finance | Gareth Jones | 2 Jun 2009

The Charity Tribunal has rejected the latest attempt by a catholic adoption charity to circumnavigate rules preventing it from discriminating against homosexual couples seeking to adopt children.

Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) had sought to take advantage of an exemption in the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007, which suggests that discrimination can occur if it is in pursuit of charitable objectives.

In its preliminary judgment in March, the Tribunal had ruled the exemption could only apply if the charity's activities were not made unlawful by other provisions.

But at the final hearing last month, the charity was unable to demonstrate that it could operate in such a way.

The charity is entitled to appeal, but could not be contacted at the time of going to press.

Tribunal criticises charity

In its judgment, the Tribunal appears to criticise the charity's representative Matthew Smith for only accepting on the day of the hearing that a ruling could not be made on the basis the Equality Bill 2009, which had recently had its second reading in the House of Commons, despite being told otherwise beforehand.

It says: “At the telephone directions hearing on 8 May, the Tribunal explained to Mr Smith that it could not properly have regard to draft legislation as an aid to the interpretation of existing legislation.

“However, that particular argument was finally withdrawn only at the 13 May hearing, when Mr Smith accepted it was a ‘red herring’.

“The Tribunal notes with regret that despite having the continuous benefit of legal advice, the Appellant's argument on this point was abandoned only after the Tribunal had indicated a strong view as to its lack of merit and after the Respondent had been put to the time and trouble of filing a skeleton argument in reply to it.”

At the telephone directions hearing, the tribunal also expressed “considerable doubt” over whether it could go back on its earlier ruling on the meaning of the charitable exemption.

However: “Mr Smith indicated that the Appellant wished to pursue the point as one of procedural fairness, although he did not then advance any legal argument or provide authority as to what power the Tribunal might have to reopen a matter on which it had previously ruled.”

Catholic principle

Speaking at the hearing, the charity’s chief executive Mark Wiggin had argued: “It is essentially a principle that we are arguing and wishing to defend here, a principle of a Catholic organisation.

“The funding aspects of it and other aspects are very secondary to our position here today.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Saudi prince promises $32bn donation to charity

2 Jul 2015

A Saudi prince has pledged to give his entire $32bn (£20bn) fortune to charity over the next few years.

ASA rejects complaint against Plan UK’s ‘anti-child marriage’ TV advert

1 Jul 2015

The Advertising Standards Authority has rejected a complaint that Plan UK’s “anti-child marriage”...

Think tank Rogare calls for a fourth fundraising regulatory body to set code of practice

30 Jun 2015

Fundraising think tank Rogare has today called upon the minister for civil society to create a fourth,...

Business models of medium-sized charities 'no longer working', CFG conference hears

2 Jul 2015

Diminishing public funds and emerging social needs will render the business models of medium sized charities...

Peers debate changing definition of social investment

2 Jul 2015

The House of Lords last night debated whether to change the definition of social investment and whether...

Breast Cancer Now loses a quarter of its staff after merger

30 Jun 2015

Breast Cancer Now has reduced staff numbers by a quarter since the merger, through a mix of redundancy...

Get a mobile compatible website or lose donors, Google executive tells charity conference

2 Jul 2015

It is "not an option" for charities to have websites which don't work on mobile, because donors are increasingly...

Contactless donations set to soar, CAF study suggests

24 Jun 2015

There is a “massive future” for charity donations using contactless payment technology, according...

RBG Kew denies pressuring TripAdvisor into deleting hundreds of negative reviews

22 Jun 2015

Kew Gardens has denied claims that it pressured travel site TripAdvisor into deleting negative reviews...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance