Share

Astonbrook staff to sue for unfair dismissal

Astonbrook staff to sue for unfair dismissal
News

Astonbrook staff to sue for unfair dismissal 1

Finance | Tania Mason | 4 Jun 2008

The 15 Astonbrook Housing Association staff sacked by the association’s interim managers Baker Tilly last week are likely to instigate unfair dismissal proceedings, their union representative has confirmed.

And solicitors appointed by the union to take up the case on their behalf will also be asked to investigate claims of discrimination, as the union understands that all of those sacked were Somalian.

At least 15 staff were issued with seemingly standard dismissal letters dated 20 May, accusing them of engaging in “activities that constitute gross misconduct”, namely “misappropriation of Astonbrook’s money”.

‘Very strange circumstances’

According to Rick Tudor, regional officer for Unison, none of those sacked have been presented with any evidence of their alleged misdemeanors; nor were they given any opportunity to deny their guilt.

“They have all been dismissed in what can only be described as very strange circumstances. These allegations have never been put to the staff, none of them have gone through any kind of formal process,” Tudor told Charity News Alert. “Nobody knows what the allegations are. All of them are fairly mystified.”

He added that there did not appear to be any connection between the dismissed workers, except that all were Somalian, and that most of them had frontline or support service jobs where they would have had little opportunity to steal from the charity. Many of them had had long careers there.

One driver did not receive his dismissal letter until the 22nd as he was working away from home, and so he continued to work for two extra days unaware he had been fired. Other letters were wrongly addressed.

The dismissal letter went out two working days after the interim managers appointed by the Charity Commission handed an £11m contract to provide housing to asylum seekers, back to the Home Office.

Claims of racial discrimination

Events took an even worse turn for those dismissed this week, said Tudor – their pay has not gone into their accounts.

“They should be entitled to payments up until 20 May at least, and some would have been owed overtime or outstanding leave.

“The other fact they have raised with us is that they are all Somalian...on the face of it, it looks to be a case of discrimination.”

According to one of the dismissed employees, Abdi Said, an allocations and IT officer at the charity, the staff did not learn that the contract was to be handed back to the Home Office from the interim managers, but from the Refugee Council or the local authority.

Pickets outside Baker Tilly offices

After hearing about this, staff picketed outside Baker Tilly’s Birmingham offices on Wednesday 14 May and outside the local Home Office headquarters on Friday 16 May. After that, Baker Tilly managers agreed to meet with staff and a meeting was held with around 100 staff on Monday 19 May.

Following that meeting, four employees were elected to meet with the managers the next day to convey how strongly staff felt about keeping the contract and saving the charity from closure. Said was one of those four representatives. The next day, he received one of the 15 dismissal letters.

“So the same day that we were pleading with them to save this charity, they were writing letters to fire us,” he said.

Tudor said that “quite a few” of the people dismissed appeared to be Unison members, so the union was now appointing solicitors to act on their behalf in pursuing tribunal claims and seeking compensation. But there is one inherent problem, he said: “If Astonbrook ceases to exist and yet the interim managers have dismissed these people on behalf of Astonbrook, who do we sue?"

What is doubly frustrating, he said, is the fact that Baker Tilly have refused to return calls from the union or to engage in any discussion about the situation.

Ongoing police investigation

Baker Tilly also declined to answer questions from Charity News Alert, preferring to stick by its original statement issued last week. This said: “We reject any suggestion undermining our undertaking as interim managers of Astonbrook which has been a challenging and complex project involving an ongoing fraud investigation.

“The fees and costs involved, which have been approved by our appointers the Charity Commission, have not in any way impacted upon services to the beneficiaries of the charity who have been our priority.

“Following the completion of a serious fraud investigation carried out by forensic accountants at Baker Tilly, 15 staff have been dismissed from Astonbrook Housing Association. The police investigation is ongoing so we are not in a position to discuss specific fraud issues further.

“This announcement coincides with an acknowledgement by the Home Office of a breach in its funding rules which has led to interim managers, Baker Tilly, agreeing to transition the NASS contracts to new providers.

“The interim managers have been in frequent communication with stakeholders and remaining staff, the majority of whom should be transferred to the new provider. It is the main priority of both ourselves and the Home Office that those accommodated by the service will not be adversely impacted during this transition.”

Ahmed Hassan
Chair
SPA
5 Jun 2008

This is a classic case of looting public to feed few. A successful, financially strong healthy charity organisation is closed and its services passed to a private firm. A cash cow is given to an undeserving firm without any risk.

A highly sucessful staff are compelled into unemployment at the expense of hard working taxpayers.

If there was a case of fraud to answer, that should be executed against offenders, but not to demolish an organisation that has been a model among the least developed of our community.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close ยป

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance