NHS deficits cause Section 64 grants crisis

Finance | Ian Allsop | 1 May 2006

The release of crucial government funding needed by many health charities in the sector is being delayed by the Department of Health due to NHS budget deficits.

The delay may mean that hundreds of charities will not be able to deliver vital services and some charities may have to close.

A number of sector workers have reportedly already been made redundant as some charities have had to wait since January for decisions on their applications for funding.

Dr Jean Collins, chief executive at Values into Action, a charity supporting and campaigning on behalf of people with learning difficulties says that the situation is devastating and frightening.

"The board of trustees has a legal obligation to plan and set a budget for the financial year but they just can't. We put our completed application in last August and although we were promised we would hear back in January, we have heard nothing and we are now in the new financial year with no idea if we are going to have some, all or none of the funding we have applied for. Staff redundancies could be as close as two months away if it carries on."

Charity Finance has also learnt that in mid-April, charities receiving Section 64 funds were sent an email informing them that the scheme was under review and until it is completed, there would be no guarantee that outstanding commitments would be paid.

In the case of Values into Action, this means that a two-year project that is halfway through would be wasted as the funding for the second part of it may not come through. Section 64 of the Health Services and Public Health Act 1968 is a funding method which means that the Secretary for State has power to make grants to voluntary organisations whose activities support the Department of Health's policy priorities.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.