Share

Counting the cost

Counting the cost
News

Counting the cost

Finance | Gareth Jones | 1 May 2006

Recent government announcements about the Treasury undertaking a major review of the third sector's role, and establishing a dedicated office to provide a coordinated strategic approach across a range of sector issues, have been greeted positively. More evidence of the seriousness given to the role of voluntary organisations, it seems.

However, at the same time there has been a rash of unconnected stories revealing the problems faced by charities while perennial funding problems remain unaddressed and there is much to be done if the sector's engagement with government does not come crashing down around its ears. Leading charity Family Service Units has been taken over by Family Welfare Association after facing administration. It said part of the reason was the government's failure to reimburse full overhead costs arising from service contracts. Delays in Department of Health funding due to NHS budget problems has led to fears that many charities could suffer.

New CFDG research has revealed that despite the laudable aim of the Treasury's cross cutter in 2002 that by April 2006 the nirvana of full cost recovery would be achieved, the reality is very different. This is backed up by Sue Ryder Care, which has found that none of its statutory commissioners, which include primary care trusts and social services, pay the true cost for the basic care they commission from the charity. The recent Public Accounts Committee report Working with the Voluntary Sector, highlighted the same old issues around funding.

We continue to hear the usual rhetoric from central government, and are now on the second version of the Compact code of practice. While it proclaims the principles of fair and effective contracting as essential to encouraging the voluntary sector to play a greater role in providing services, this is simply not happening at a local level. The result is that charities continue to work under poorer contracting conditions than public and private providers. There are serious concerns that without firm commitment from government to place the onus on local commissioners to change the way they contract with charities, then increasing the voluntary sector's capacity to provide services will be extremely difficult. This has to be addressed with action and not just words, reviews and more consultation.

Security guards

This really shouldn't need spelling out, but the findings of our latest IT survey on charities' approach to security issues are quite worrying. While 90 per cent of respondents felt security was adequately dealt with in their organisation, less than a third actually had any procedure in place to test this. Having virus software and firewalls is not enough. How can you possibly know that the systems you have in place work if they are not tested?

There remains a perception in some organisations that there are more important projects to spend money on and until they have an incident or a near miss then they will continue to sideline security. Another problem is that there is a conspiracy of silence over the question of internet security, as only one in eight computer crimes are apparently reported. Until threats are perceived as being more likely attitudes will be difficult to change.

A graphic illustration of what the consequences can be came last year when hackers breached the security of the Aid to the Church in Need website and stole the credit card details, names and addresses of 2,800 charity donors held on the system. This particular charity had security measures in place, including encryption and secure server access, and felt it was safe. But technology moves quickly and hackers get ever more sophisticated in how they operate. Which makes it even more important that security is tested, and tested regularly. Finance directors would not dream of operating without rigorous financial controls, and they know they work because they are audited. Surely IT security should be a similar priority.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Public thinks volunteers more worthy of honours than charity professionals

23 May 2012

New research released by nfpSynergy claims that almost half the British public think that voluntary sector...

Tribunal unholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Marketers voice concerns over email conversion rates

21 May 2012

Conversion rates are the biggest concern for nearly half of all email marketers surveyed by the Direct...

Samsung launches Olympics app to fundraise for Kids Company

16 May 2012

Samsung has launched the Hope Relay mobile app to raise money for three charities including Kids Company,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance