Religious charities submit over half of public benefit responses

Finance | Gareth Jones | 17 Jan 2008

The Charity Commission has admitted it could have done a better job at communicating the public benefit implications of the Charities Act for religious charities, after nearly 60 per cent of responses to its public benefit consultation came from such groups.

The Act has removed the presumption of public benefit for charities set up to advance education or religion or to relieve poverty, and requires every charity to explicitly demonstrate that their purposes are for the public benefit.

Under questioning by the public administration select committee (PASC), Commission chair Dame Suzi Leather (pictured) said that despite reassurances that the removal of the presumption of public benefit for religious organisations was not "a drive to secularise society", feedback from religious groups showed that it "hadn't done a good enough job" in getting this message across.

Directory: Charity Commission
Who's Who: Suzi Leather

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.