Additionality concept still intact but practice is under review, says BIG
24 May 2013
The Big Lottery Fund has denied that its recent grants to Citizens Advice Bureaux and Home-start charities...
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
The Charity Commission has finally published its inquiry report into the Cancer Care Foundation following a statutory inquiry which lasted more than ten years and cost just under £500,000 in interim manager’s fees.
The Commission described the case as “an unusually involved investigation, which comprised complex legal issues, litigation by concerned parties, the appointment of an interim manager, insolvency proceedings and new trustees being appointed to the charity”.
The Commission’s suspicions were aroused by the charity’s high fundraising costs and low levels of charitable expenditure. An earlier inquiry, which concluded in 1999, considered similar issues and the Commission and the charity had agreed some future targets for income, expenditure and donations to hospices. These targets were missed and because of the “significant and recurrent nature” of the concerns, the Commission opened a second inquiry on 22 August 2002.
Ian Oakley Smith and Adrian Stanway of PricewaterhouseCoopers were appointed as interim managers on 15 September 2003, to manage the affairs of the charity in place of its trustees. Their total bill over nine years came to £494,064.
This inquiry examined whether Cancer Care Foundation’s acquisition of a subsidiary trading company, Caring Together, and the subsequent fundraising agreements were in the best interests of the charity. It found the trustees did not act in the best interests of the charity.
It also concluded that former trustees and members of their families received unauthorised benefits in breach of trust.
The interim managers told the Commission that they had found payments representing improper benefits totalling around £308,500 from 1999 to 2003 had been paid to current and former trustees and their families.
The Commission said its intervention secured the future of the charity and ensured its income was preserved for beneficiaries. It said: "The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as interim manager safeguarded donations, secured gift aid payments, and preserved a well-established income stream for when new trustees were appointed."
Since the appointment of new trustees in April 2009 the charity has donated just over £3.5m to several children’s hospices, the Commission added.
The full report into Cancer Care Foundation can be read here.
24 May 2013
The Big Lottery Fund has denied that its recent grants to Citizens Advice Bureaux and Home-start charities...
24 May 2013
The brutal murder of soldier Lee Rigby this week has led to a sharp rise in donations to Help for Heroes...
22 May 2013
Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas has tabled a series of Parliamentary questions to minister...
24 May 2013
The Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations has criticised the Scottish regulator, OSCR, for stepping...
24 May 2013
Acevo chief executive Sir Stephen Bubb has said the Charity Commission will have to get better at regulating...
24 May 2013
The chief executive of Barnardo’s Anne Marie Carrie will leave the children’s charity next month after...
24 May 2013
The Charity Commission launched its new website today, and hopes that the improvements will make it easier...
22 May 2013
Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...
20 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
27 Nov 2013