Nesta launches crowdfunding directory
21 May 2013
Nesta has launched an online directory which lists all the crowdfunding sites in the UK.
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
The Charity Commission will now conclude its statutory investigation into Astonbrook Housing Association following the imprisonment of two of the asylum housing charity's former trustees on Friday (14 September) after pleading guilty to fraud of £1.8m.
Mohammed Hassan Arwo and Abdillahi Musa Abdi were each imprisoned for four and a half years after admitting conspiracy to defraud. Four further charity members were also imprisoned for a collective total of 8.3 years after admitting to money laundering.
Birmingham's Astonbrook Housing Association registered with the Charity Commission in September 2002 with the object of providing housing, advice and counselling to asylum seekers.
The charity won the approval of the UK Borders Agency and Birmingham City Council which over a number of years provided millions of pounds for this purpose. However while the charity purchased 20 properties in Birmingham in order to secure continued funding, the police investigation found that much of the money was being transferred to bank accounts in Dubai. The criminals also made out crooked cheques to themselves under the guise of being paid for legitimate goods and services.
While charged with fraud to the sum of £1.8m, West Midlands Police, which undertook the criminal investigation, believe that the total amount of public funds lost through the criminals' activity could total up to £6m.
Sergeant Emma Hickl from the West Midlands Police's Economic Crime Unit said: “The behaviour of these individuals was so audacious that they did not only exploit Birmingham City Council and UKBA, but ultimately every single taxpayer in this country.
"They also showed complete disregard for the welfare of the asylum seekers they were paid to help in the first place."
The Charity Commission opened a statutory investigation into the charity in May 2007 after concerns were raised relating to fraudulent mismanagement and misconduct at the charity. It appointed two interim managers from Baker Tilly to secure the charity's funds and safeguard the interest of its beneficiaries.
Detectives from the West Midlands Police began investigating the financial affairs of the charity in June 2007, and in July 2007 the force raided the property with 70 officers and subsequently scrutinised 18,000 cheques and fraudulent invoices.
The charity went into liquidation in March 2009 and Baker Tilly was then appointed by the court as liquidator to wind up the charity, a process which is still ongoing. Charity Commission records show that the charity has provided only one set of accounts since its registration, which are not publicly available.
The trustees' convictions mean they are no longer eligible to be trustees of any charity in the future and each has been banned for ten years from being the director of a company. The West Midlands Police force advised it will now use the Proceeds of Crime Act to recover any assets and return them as compensation to the victims "and ultimately to the taxpayer".
Michelle Russell, head of investigations and enforcement at the Charity Commission welcomed the action and said: "The public put their trust in those who are in charge of charities to ensure vital services are provided to those who most need them and that money given to charity is used only for those purposes... Using a charity for criminal purposes such as has happened here is absolutely abhorrent.
"This case shows how effectively the police, the Charity Commission and other agencies can work together to catch those who abuse charities. Now that criminal proceedings are concluded we will look at any outstanding reglatory issues relating to our inquiry and publish a report once it is completed."
In 2008 the £11m contract initially awarded to Astonbrook Housing Association to provide housing to asylum seekers was transferred to Priority Properties North West. The move saw legal action from staff at the charity who were dismissed in the process and claimed unfair dismissal on the basis of failing to comply with the transfer of undertakings procedures, but the action was struck out.
Astonbrook staff to sue for unfair dismissal
Treasurer given five-year sentence for £500,000 fraud
Multi-million pound charity fraudsters jailed
Charity finance chiefs jailed for fraud
Bogus charity collector jailed for 13 months
Interim manager secures £19.5m of contracts for fraud asylum charity
"But that's why we have a CEO ...."!
Former Astonbrook staff 'not subject to TUPE' says new contractor
Fraud worries override concerns about small charity access to small donations scheme
21 May 2013
Nesta has launched an online directory which lists all the crowdfunding sites in the UK.
21 May 2013
The Big Lottery Fund has announced over £44m in funding for 160 community groups as part of its Reaching...
21 May 2013
The Canal and River Trust has challenged product design students from Central St Martins university in...
21 May 2013
Cancer Research UK has signed up 16 high-flying philanthropists to the development board to lead its £100m...
20 May 2013
The Information Tribunal has ruled that the Department for Work and Pensions must publish the names of...
20 May 2013
An impressive array of sector leaders turned out in all their finery on Saturday to attend the wedding...
20 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
17 May 2013
The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...
16 May 2013
While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
Peter Horah
Private
17 Sep 2012
This is an excellent example of how the Charity Commission has executed it's role - but at a time when they had more staff and funding, I suggest.
Since 2010, the Charity Commission has reduced it's resources and I fear the capability of uncovering fraud of this nature - particularly if criminals use very clever and deceptive techniques to hide their operations.
It should not be a suprise if we find an increase of complicated fraudulant activities as a result of the economic climate and the reduced capacity of regulatory authorities to scrutinise and audit the activities in the Third Sector.
[Reply]