Share

Lord Phillips: Social investment could yet be included in Financial Services Bill

Lord Andrew Phillips of Sudbury
News

Lord Phillips: Social investment could yet be included in Financial Services Bill

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 11 Jul 2012

Lord Phillips of Sudbury has said he is hopeful that government will support concessions for social investment in the Financial Services Bill which is currently going through the House of Lords.

The Bill currently makes no specific reference to social investment, and attempts by Labour MP Christopher Leslie and Lord Phillips to get social investment mentioned in the Bill have failed or been withdrawn. Lord Phillips withdrew his latest attempt late yesterday after a debate.

However, he told civilsociety.co.uk that he believed it could be possible to persuade government to make some concessions for the “social investment fraternity” during the Bill’s passage through the House of Lords. 

In the House of Commons, MP Leslie’s social investment amendments was narrowly defeated across party lines, when eight Labour MPs who voted in support were defeated by ten Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs.

However, Phillips said the House of Lords was “much less partisan”:

“This is not a partisan issue,” he said. “And the coalition government has gone out of its way to encourage social investment”.

The Bill reached committee stage in the House of Lords yesterday, where Lord Phillips and fellow peers debated amendments he had tabled in support of social investment.

With regards to the social investment sector and the new Financial Conduct Authority who will regulate all financial activity, Lord Phillips stressed that “one size did not fit all”:

“The message repeated from end to end of the not-for-profit sector. It wants the regulators to have a sensible discretion to distinguish, as I say, between theses very different animals,” he said.

“The minister in the Commons made a plea that we must have a level playing field, with no distinction between massive international banks and a little local social endeavours. To the sector, and indeed to me, that is not a level playing field; it is a level killing field.”

Conservative peer Lord Hodgson broadly supported Lord Phillip’s amendment, as did Labour peer Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town.

However, concerns were raised by Commercial Secretary to the Treasury Lord Sassoon on amendments which indicated that the new financial regulator should not inhibit the development of social investment:

“Although I agree with my noble friend Lord Phillips of Sudbury that the government need to act in support of the social investment sector, we will not create a healthy UK financial services market, including for social financial services, by giving the FCA the job of taking forward what should be and is part of the government’s wider social policy agenda.”

In the end Lord Phillips withdrew his amendments, but told civilsociety.co.uk that when the Bill is debated again in the House of Lords he was hopeful that there would be support from peers and government on the inclusion of concessions for social investment.

"I had a discussion after the debate with the Bill team and Lord Sassoon. There is everything to play for."

The Bill is expected to be debated by peers again in the Autumn.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Barnardo's launches retail gift aid appeal

23 Jul 2014

Barnardo’s has launched an appeal to raise awareness of retail gift aid and the extra £6.5m that could...

Charity Commission opens inquiry into Families Against Neuroblastoma

22 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has frozen the bank accounts of Families Against Neuroblastoma and appointed two...

Cabinet Office overruled own grants panel to fund Big Society Network charity

21 Jul 2014

The Cabinet Office vetoed its own appointed grantmaking advisory panel in order to make a £300,000 grant...

Workfare charities set to be named after Tribunal rules against DWP

23 Jul 2014

Charities that are involved in the workfare programme run by the Department for Work and Pensions look...

Nesta was 'forced' to fund Big Society Network, says former trustee

22 Jul 2014

Former Nesta trustee Liam Black tweeted this morning that Nesta was “forced” to fund Big Society Network. 

Sadiq Khan MP: 'Sarah' Bill is embarrassing and pathetic

22 Jul 2014

Labour MP Sadiq Khan yesterday called the Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill “embarrassing...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance