'Women' dropped from WRVS in re-brand
20 May 2013
The WRVS, which mobilised women on the home front during World War II, has today dropped the reference...
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
Charities must be allowed the freedom to approach potential social investors in a more informal way than they can currently if the social investment market is to grow, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts said this week.
Lord Hodgson – who is leading the official review of the Charities Act 2006 - was speaking at the second reading of the Financial Services Bill in the House of Lords on Monday. He pointed out that although the government is keen to encourage social investment, it is barely mentioned at all in the Bill.
He said that the biggest challenge to the growth of the market concerns the interaction between charities and their individual supporters.
“The missing piece in the jigsaw at present is the ability to approach individuals about social impact investments without the need for a full Companies Act prospectus, the cost of which renders almost any scheme uneconomic,” he said.
“We are therefore in the counterproductive and counterintuitive position that an individual can give his or her money to a project and be certain that he or she will not get it back, but he or she cannot lend or invest it if there is any prospect of any return at all. That cannot be a sensible way of proceeding to try to encourage our fellow citizens to put money behind social impact projects that this country badly needs.”
Lord Hodgson said he hoped that when the Bill reaches Committee stage, ideas will be discussed to “help the social impact butterfly out of its chrysalis”.
One such idea he proposed is to establish a class of individual supporters or investors, “perhaps by creating a self-certified social investor along the existing lines of the self-certified sophisticated investor”.
In 2005, the rules relating to approaching people regarding financial promotions were relaxed so that so-called ‘sophisticated investors’ - high net worth individuals - could be more easily approached with a view to making investments in unlisted securities. The purpose was to remove impediments to business angels and others seeking finance for small businesses and to allow entrepreneurs to find venture capital more easily.
Lord Hodgson acknowledged that various government departments will need to be involved if the social investment market is to move forward significantly, and added: “In my view, it will probably take a generation for the social impact investment movement to reach its full potential, but we need to plan now, and financial regulation, more than any other sector, holds the key.”
20 May 2013
The WRVS, which mobilised women on the home front during World War II, has today dropped the reference...
20 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
17 May 2013
The Independent Commission for Aid Impact has called on the Department for International Development to...
20 May 2013
The Information Tribunal has ruled that the Department for Work and Pensions must publish the names of...
20 May 2013
An impressive array of sector leaders turned out in all their finery on Saturday to attend the wedding...
20 May 2013
Peter Bennett-Jones has decided to step down as chairman of Comic Relief after 15 years at the helm.
20 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
17 May 2013
The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...
16 May 2013
While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...
Chris Zealley
truteeships various
13 Jun 2012
The current enthusiasm for social investment overlooks one major problem it will make for charitable trustees and lenders. Someone making a grant, as Lord Hodgson says, knows that they wont get their money back. So in that case there is no problem for trustees.
But investors providing loans, however easy the terms on which they have been made, are entitled to clear rights regarding the return of their money, otherwise they might just as well make a grant. So the so far unanswered question for trustees is where the repayment of loans stands in the hierarchy of their obligations in carrying out their trust.
[Reply]