Share

The sector’s victory: Charity tax relief cap u-turn

The sector’s victory: Charity tax relief cap u-turn
Blogs

The sector’s victory: Charity tax relief cap u-turn 3

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 31 May 2012

In the face of a united charity sector opposing the government’s cap on tax relief for donations, the Chancellor has backed down. Well done, team, says Celina Ribeiro.

You know, there were never any real, hard facts about just how much the government’s proposed limit on how much higher-rate taxpayers can claim relief on their donations was going to cost charities.

Oh, there were figures floating around. Some said £1bn, some said tens of millions, but many charities quietly mused that it would barely affect them at all. No one, not the government nor anyone from the charity sector, could come up with concrete evidence regarding the harm to the sector nor the alleged windfall to the government.

However today, coincidentally just as Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt faces the Leveson Inquiry to answer questions about his involvement with News Corporation and the company’s BSkyB bid, the good Chancellor drops a bombshell. A beautiful charity sector bombshell which explodes to release daisies, bunnies and hundreds of happy charity umbrella body lobbyists.

The tax relief cap is no more. Now charities can really put their feet up over the Jubilee long weekend.

Earlier this year I wrote about how impressed I was with the speed and the unity of the sector’s response to the tax relief cap, announced in the March Budget. Within days usually warring umbrella bodies united behind a simple message: ‘Give it Back George’. And by George, he’s given it back.

Who would have thought the sector could achieve such a spectacular ministerial about-face when it rallied together?

And so it’s time for self-congratulation. Well done the sector for managing to speak with one voice, so forcefully and so consistently. Well done for sticking with it when some commentators, as recently as this morning, declared a U-turn impossible.

The government should also be commended for its U-turn. There is a long list of U-turns attributed to this government. Doing an about-face on this is evidence that the Treasury had not through the implications of this, despite their avowed commitment to not allowing the wealthy to be their own chancellors of the exchequer, not their quickly-dismissed claims about the masses of ‘dodgy’ charities into which tax dodgers were funnelling bogus donations. But backtracking on this is also a sign that the government has listened, and that it is willing to step away from bad policy decisions, and for that they also should be given credit.

A victory. A resounding victory for the sector, yes. But a victory for the causes, for the work on the ground. For the museums which will be able to pay salaries, for the women who will have a place to kip when trying to escape violence, for the cancer sufferer given new hope by a ground-breaking treatment. Charities, take credit, take the donations and put them to work.

This is the sector’s victory, yes. But charities are merely the vehicle. It’s a victory for the belief in the right and importance of people to help other people. 

Kevin Curley
31 May 2012

A great victory for NCVO and Sir Stuart's leadership. Others will claim the credit. But this would not have happened without NCVO's ability to mobilise the sector and Stuart's ability to inspire action across the sector's divides.

Kevin Curley

Stolen
1 Jun 2012
Response to [Kevin Curley]

I do remember Stuart and others acting in magnificent unity when part of the charity sector faced the loss of investment funds held in the Icelandic banking system.

They asked the Treasury to compenate such charities using funds due to other parts of the charity sector.

Nonetheless it remains to be seen if this budget U-turn is a great victory or even a victory at all.

Daniel Jones
31 May 2012

Good news for the sector. Looks like Big Society does work after all...

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Islamic Relief Worldwide income falls by £18m

20 Oct 2014

Islamic Relief Worldwide has seen its income drop from £100m in 2012 to £82m in 2013, according to...

Charity criticised after refusing to pay Ashya King’s parents' legal fees

17 Oct 2014

Kids 'n' Cancer UK has been criticised for saying it will not pay the legal fees of the family of Ashya...

Voluntary sector sees “revolving door” of staff, says report

20 Oct 2014

The voluntary sector is experiencing a “revolving door” of staff with employee turnover levels at...

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Paul Farmer appointed chair of Acevo

17 Oct 2014

Paul Farmer, chief executive of Mind, has been appointed the chair of the Association of Chief Executives...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Nesta has made no grants to charities from its Impact Investments Fund

16 Oct 2014

Only 15 per cent of applications to a Nesta fund to invest in innovations to help older people, children...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance