Share

Two-thirds of large charities will cut frontline services

Two-thirds of large charities will cut frontline services
News

Two-thirds of large charities will cut frontline services2

Finance | Niki May Young | 29 May 2012

Three-quarters of large charities have already or will be making redundancies in the next year, and two-thirds will be cutting frontline services according to a survey looking into the commissioning landscape for charities.

Charities with an income over £800,000 which receive some form of government funding were surveyed in When the going gets tough: Charities' experiences of public sector commissioning, with 101 responding. The research, conducted by New Philanthropy Capital and Zurich aims to understand how the new commissioning world is affecting the charity sector.

The research found that the majority of charities responding to a high level of government funding cuts are shedding staff or services as a result. 

Funding cuts

Similar to other studies conducted in this area, the research found that local authority cuts are hitting charities the hardest. Some 36 per cent said their overall government income had reduced compared to last year, with 12 per cent saying it had been reduced by 20 per cent or more. However 59 per cent said they were experiencing cuts in funding from local authorities with 23 per cent saying that these cuts are over 20 per cent. Circa 50 per cent said their overall government income stayed the same and 17 per cent said it had increased.

Charities were questioned on their perceptions as to why they were suffering the cuts, with much of the blame focused on the commissioning process. Some 53 per cent believe the price commissioners will pay has gone down and 46 per cent believe the service being provided through commissioning has been reduced. Around 26 per cent say that the service they provide has been cut altogether while 29 per cent said they had lost out on contracts to other charity, public sector or private sector providers. 

In addition 20 per cent said that the awarding of contracts and grants had been suspended and circa 42 per cent said grants had been cut altogether or were not being renewed.

The survey states that in response to these cuts, charities are, "having to make tough choices about the front-line services they provide for the people the are trying to help. Cuts are also having an impact on the size and structure of organsiations, and even their ability to survive".

Over 65 per cent have cut or expect to cut frontline services as a result of cuts, while 85 per cent have, or expect to change the services they provide to beneficiaries in the next year. 

The research highlights a high level of uncertainty in the sector with 30 per cent unsure of whether they are at risk of closure, while 9 per cent either had already suffered closure or expected it to happen in the next year. 

Staff are also feeling the brunt of cuts with 73 per cent of respondents having already made, or expecting to make redundancies in the next year.

Responses to the survey

Dan Corry, NPC chief executive said in his foreword to the survey that, "Of course, everyone finds periods of change difficult, and if new types of contract produce better outcomes more cost effectively, then we should surely pursue them. But we need to keep an eye on what is happening to providers as a result of all this. If we create a world with fewer charities providing services, then we may have lost something precious."

Responding to the research, shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas painted a harsher picture: "This is further grim evidence that ministers are not providing the leadership charities need.

"Huge cuts in funding, government contracts not delivering what ministers promised and the charity tax debacle are all eating away at the capacity of Britain's charities and community groups to make our communities stronger."

But current minister for civil society Nick Hurd himself did not respond, instead a spokesperson for the Office for Civil Society said:

"We know it is a very challenging environment for charities, especially those dependent on taxpayer funding. The sector cannot be immune from cuts but at the same time we are opening up more opportunities for charities to help us deliver better public services.

"Through interventions like Big Society Capital and a new Investment and Contract Readiness Fund we are helping ambitious charities access the capital they need to expand their services."

 

 

Hilary Barnard
Principal Consultant
HBMC
29 May 2012

The NPC report is important in strengthening the evidence base of the generally quite significantly worsening picture for third sector organisations who are commissioned by public service agencies. It is depressing to say that the survey results are hardly a great surprise; neither is the very inadequate response from the Office for Civil Society.

The issue increasingly for the sector is whether the underlying economic rationale of deep cuts, often disproprtionately falling on the sector and its beneficiaries, adds up. The NPC survey paints a picture of growing damage to the sector by these cuts, which appear to lack proper justification. Plan A has led to double dip recession. Following the election of a new French President, the focus is increasingly on growth, almost everywhere it seems except here in the UK. It is probably time for Plan B here, in which the sector and its beneficiaries can both contribute to and benefit.

Peter Horah
Private comment
None
29 May 2012

It was inevitable that if you sever the life-line that charities depend upon in the form of local authority contracts, the outcome will be cuts to front line services.

There is an unrealistic expectation from Government and others as to the resilience of charities who deliver very complex professional services.

Competence, trust and leadership are needed when implementing restructuring strategies – and we cannot have faith in a Government and their Ministers who demonstrate how little they know or understand the impact of their decisions.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Islamic Relief Worldwide income falls by £18m

20 Oct 2014

Islamic Relief Worldwide has seen its income drop from £100m in 2012 to £82m in 2013, according to...

Charity criticised after refusing to pay Ashya King’s parents' legal fees

17 Oct 2014

Kids 'n' Cancer UK has been criticised for saying it will not pay the legal fees of the family of Ashya...

Voluntary sector sees “revolving door” of staff, says report

20 Oct 2014

The voluntary sector is experiencing a “revolving door” of staff with employee turnover levels at...

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Paul Farmer appointed chair of Acevo

17 Oct 2014

Paul Farmer, chief executive of Mind, has been appointed the chair of the Association of Chief Executives...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Nesta has made no grants to charities from its Impact Investments Fund

16 Oct 2014

Only 15 per cent of applications to a Nesta fund to invest in innovations to help older people, children...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance