DWP refuses to release Work Programme risk register to Labour

Finance | Tania Mason | 17 May 2012

The government has refused a Freedom of Information request from Gareth Thomas MP, shadow minister for civil society, to provide him with the risk register that it prepared for the Work Programme.

Thomas revealed that he had submitted the FoI request to DWP at yesterday’s Civil Society Question Time debate on the first two years of the coalition government, organised by Civil Society Media and NCVO and attended by dozens of charity sector chief executives.

In his opening critique of the coalition's record to date, Thomas said: “It is the big issues, where warnings were given and warnings were ignored, where ministers are most culpable.

“I am currently using the FoI process to seek the risk register for the Work Programme, because I believe and have been told that ministers were warned and deliberately ignored advice that charities would lose out under the Work Programme.

“Francis Maude promised that charities would get 30 to 40 per cent of referrals but nothing like that has happened, it’s been about 20 per cent at best.”

After the event, Thomas told civilsociety.co.uk that his original FoI request for the risk register had already been rejected by the government and that he was appealing against that decision, on the grounds that the information is in the public interest.

“I think we need to know whether ministers were given advice and ignored it, or is there something fundamentally wrong with the way they designed the Work Programme,” he said.

The Work Programme came in for yet more bashing during the debate, with NCVO chief Sir Stuart Etherington describing it as “a walking disaster for voluntary organisations”. He said that the vast majority of voluntary sector groups simply don’t have the required working capital to enable them to participate.

Directory: Farrer & Co | Grant Thornton UK LLP | Newton Investment Management Ltd
Who's Who: Gareth Thomas

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.