Share

Foundations must improve transparency, finds DfID report

DfID website
News

Foundations must improve transparency, finds DfID report

Finance | Niki May Young | 20 Jan 2012

The Department for International Development (DfID) must help foundations to improve transparency and pre-empt legal enforcement of reporting, according to a parliamentary report on DfID’s relationship with foundations.

The report by the International Development Committee (IDC) highlights the areas of success, and where improvement is necessary for DfID in its relationship with private foundations. It said that compared to traditional donors, foundation reporting was weak, and that a US approach, where foundations are required to list every grant made, and pay out 5 per cent of the value of their endowment each year for charitable purpose, could be on the cards.

“Improved transparency amongst foundations would help pre-empt the need to move to this kind of mandatory regulation in the UK,” said the Committee, calling on DfID to encourage foundations to sign up to its International Aid Transparency Initiative, a voluntary reporting system currently used by just a few foundations, including the Hewlett Foundation.

The idea of a mandatory 5 per cent annual giving output for foundations was mooted in 2009 in a Cass Business School report which argued that a formal distribution quota could increase the charitable funding of endowed foundations by 31.5 per cent or around £1bn per annum. 

But the foundation sector strongly opposed the idea and it never gained traction.

Limited information is available on the impact of foundations, but research released last November showed that family foundations had outpaced the growth of both corporate and individual giving, with the total value of donations by the top 100 family foundations increasing by 27 per cent in the five years previous. These foundations gave £1.3bn in 2009/10, which accounted for 7 per cent of all giving in that year.

Need to engage more with smaller foundations

The IDC report also highlights a need for DfID to engage more with smaller foundations, advising that it found smaller charities received a less open line of communication than larger foundations, which are appointed a named contact. DfID’s relationship with foundations was found to be “somewhat ad hoc”, with larger foundations such as the Gates Foundation interacting directly on a weekly basis, while smaller charities reported finding it difficult to have any kind of regular contact with the Department.

As a result of the Committee raising these concerns, the Secretary of State for International Development Andrew Mitchell has agreed to host an annual meeting of smaller foundations. DfID recommends that this is increased to a bi-annually or quarterly meeting instead, and that the Department offers a named contact for every foundation.

A better funding relationship between DfID and foundations could be developed, the Committee found, advising that foundations could be useful in relieving the burden of distributing smaller funding packages. The recommendation was in response to a series of foundations advising that there were not enough opportunities for collaboration of this kind.

Foundations in developing countries

Greater collaboration with foundations based in developing countries was also identified as a necessity going forward. “We recommend that, as part of its wider efforts to improve aid effectiveness, DfID ensures that its country offices and assist partner governments co-ordinate foundations and philanthropists seeking opportunities in the country.

"Further, DfID is only in the early stages of engaging with developing country-based foundations. We suggest it increases its engagement in order to form partnerships with these important new philanthropic actors.”

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Age UK spends £1.8m in latest round of redundancies

21 Oct 2014

Age UK spent £1.81m on 120 redundancies in 2014, on top of £1.17m last year, as part of a review of...

Stand Up To Cancer raises over £14.5m

21 Oct 2014

This weekend's Stand Up To Cancer event has raised over £14.5m so far, and that figure is continuing...

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Demonstrate effectiveness or risk losing public trust, charities told

24 Oct 2014

Charities must demonstrate their effectiveness better to the public or face losing trust, David McCullough,...

Volunteers no longer happy to 'do what they are told', says report

24 Oct 2014

Volunteers now expect more from their experience and charities must do more to recruit and retain them,...

Relationship between government and charity 'has lost its way', says Nandy

23 Oct 2014

There needs to be a rebalancing of the relationship between the voluntary sector and government, shadow...

BeatBullying's technology CIC has not filed accounts with Companies House

22 Oct 2014

A software community interest company set up by the BeatBullying Group in 2012 is almost a year late filing...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance