Nesta launches crowdfunding directory
21 May 2013
Nesta has launched an online directory which lists all the crowdfunding sites in the UK.
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
The Centre for Social Justice has said a scheme which gives companies tax relief for subsidising voluntary work carried out by their employees would boost donations to charities by around £1bn a year.
The scheme, called the “C-Volunteering” plan, will be outlined in an upcoming report from the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), an influential think tank set up by Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Iain Duncan Smith.
Under the proposed new scheme companies would enrol in the "C-Volunteering Initiative" and so qualify for tax relief.
Employees would be encouraged to give up some of their working time to a charity of their choice and the firm would boost the value of their contribution by agreeing an hourly rate for the voluntary work.
For instance, if an employee gave up 19 hours a month, his firm would agree an hourly rate and then pay that to the charity. If the matching funding was set at the minimum wage of £6.08 an hour, the charity's funds would be boosted by 19 x £6.08 a month or £115.52. A special online C-Account would be set up to receive the company's donations and the money would be paid to the chosen charity.
Firms, meanwhile, would be able to recoup some of the costs by setting their gifts against corporation tax in much the same way as they can offset research and development bills.
Gavin Poole, executive director of the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), said: "We need imaginative new schemes to get British companies playing a bigger role in tackling deep-seated problems, such as educational failure and welfare dependency, that are holding back the country economically and socially.
"These proposals are a practical blueprint for revitalising Britain's hugely important and valuable third sector and helping them at a local level to rebuild shattered lives.
"Britain has a great track record for charitable donations and for people freely giving up their time as volunteers. But we are still far behind the United States, where the charitable impulse is more deeply ingrained.
"In the US, charitable donations run at $212bn (£136bn) a year - proportionately almost double the UK’s. We need to move closer to the American culture of corporate giving."
The CSJ report points out that currently the big charities, like Oxfam and the RSPCA, get the lion's share of donations. The biggest 3 per cent of all UK charities attract 75 per cent of the funding. Small-scale charities of the kind championed by the CSJ, risk being overlooked by their bigger, better-funded counterparts, it warns.
"C-Volunteering has the potential to revolutionise corporate philanthropic culture, to create a new culture of volunteering and giving with far-reaching benefits to society," says the CSJ report.
"Ideally, the government would set no limit to the amount of tax relief that could be reclaimed by firms supporting the C-Volunteering scheme. But if the relief was capped at a reasonable level – say £330m a year – that could generate an extra £1.3bn for charities, an increase of about 10 per cent in their annual income."
The CSJ proposals have been drawn up in conjunction with ‘C’, a new social enterprise group led by three senior business professionals.
Carl Allen
5 Jan 2012
Another attempt at integrated policy by government to deliver Big Society or perhaps the lowest rate of corporation tax in the EU.
Paul Edwards
Community Development Worker
N/A
4 Jan 2012
This proposal makes no sense at all. Whay should companies in effect be paid by the taxpayer to allow their staff to volunteer? They should be moved by the charitable impulse to give something back to society not by the prospect of tax breaks.
I am not surprised that this idea comes from a right-of-centre, Government-sponsored thinktank. All this government wants to do is to find yet more ways of shovelling public funds into the pockets of private companies. Any excuse will do.
Ben Wittenberg
DSC
4 Jan 2012
"We need imaginative new schemes" - really? I'm less convinced. There are two (main) problems that need to be addressed - getting more companies to give, and getting companies that do give to give more/better.
The problem that needs tackling isn't the means, it's the will.
Chris Jarvis
President
Realized Worth
3 Jan 2012
Sounds like a great initiative. But I may have missed something in the explanation.
Isn't this just a 'dollars for doers' program? Most Fortune 500 companies in the USA already have these initiatives in place (as well as Canada). I understood that companies in the UK were already doing this as well?
So what I'm missing is the 'new' aspect of this idea.
By the way, matching volunteer hours at the minimum wage of £6.08 an hour will only de-incentivize your employees from going to the trouble of recording those hours.
For more thots on this type of program check out 'Dollar for Doers: The Incentive Nobody Wants' - http://bit.ly/vxQTRI
Carl Allen
3 Jan 2012
Such is the lack of corporate social responsibility that political lobbyists are attempting to make profit from volunteering for companies.
But which public service will fall to finance the taxation loss and which charities will be humbled to receive corporate favour?
Wendy Wu
PhD Student
6 Jan 2012
Response to [Carl Allen]
What requiring from Corporates is to create social value at the outset of the business operation, not based on tax incentive nor charitable impulse but embedded social responsibilities. Why such an initiative is only for corporate? What about the individual volunteer in the community, does it mean that government will deduct their salaried tax from the family income (F-volunteering)???
Carl Allen
6 Jan 2012
Response to [Wendy Wu ]
Great point about the individual volunteer.
21 May 2013
Nesta has launched an online directory which lists all the crowdfunding sites in the UK.
21 May 2013
The Big Lottery Fund has announced over £44m in funding for 160 community groups as part of its Reaching...
21 May 2013
The Canal and River Trust has challenged product design students from Central St Martins university in...
21 May 2013
Cancer Research UK has signed up 16 high-flying philanthropists to the development board to lead its £100m...
20 May 2013
The Information Tribunal has ruled that the Department for Work and Pensions must publish the names of...
20 May 2013
An impressive array of sector leaders turned out in all their finery on Saturday to attend the wedding...
20 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
17 May 2013
The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...
16 May 2013
While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
Rhodri Davies
Policy Manager
Charities Aid Foundation
6 Jan 2012
Potentially the most alarming issue with the "C volunteering" idea, which doesn't seemed to have been mentioned, is the suggestion that the tax break for companies based on employee volunteering hours at minimum wage should "work like the corporate R&D tax break".
This implies that the CSJ thinks a tax break of more than 100% is the ideal (the R&D tax break is 200%). So not only would a company get relief on the value of time employees spend volunteering, it would also be able to offset part or whole of that value again against further tax liabilities.
Given that all other charitable tax incentives work on the principle of relieving or reimbursing only the tax paid on money donated, how can this scheme justify proposing to offer relief for corporates not only on the total value of their employees' volunteering time but also on a further multiple of this? Isn't that basically using taxpayers money not only to directly reward giving but also to offer an additional indirect reward?
[Reply]