HMRC prepares for fight over temp staff VAT charge

Finance | Gareth Jones | 1 Sep 2011

HMRC has refused to budge on its insistence that charities must pay VAT on the wages of temporary staff, confirming the likelihood of a test case being brought on the issue.

Charities had been encouraged by the result of Reed Employment Ltd vs Revenue & Customs, which agreed with the employment agency’s argument that it should only charge VAT when introducing staff to partially exempt organisations such as charities, not on those individuals’ subsequent wages.

However, last week HMRC released Revenue & Customs Brief 32/11, which indicated that it would not change its policy as First Tier Tribunal decisions are not binding, and also because the Reed case applies to an historical period prior to HMRC’s change in policy in 2009.

Graham Elliott, head of VAT at haysmacintyre, told civilsociety.co.uk that the move was not unexpected, and that HMRC had previously declined to appeal the Reed case in order that the Upper Tribunal could not pass down a decision that would be binding.

“Given how much revenue is tied up in this, and how much cost is tied up in this for charities, the financial sector and other organisations, it is highly likely that another case will be brought based upon a more recent scenario.

“HMRC are at the very least playing for time on this and hoping for a better result.”

He added that he had heard rumours of a major charity putting together a “fighting fund” with other charities to challenge on the issue, but said it might also be an employment agency that takes up the case.

On the likelihood of success, Elliott hinted that HMRC’s case may be stronger than is commonly believed, saying only that it is “finely balanced”.

Graham Elliott will be speaking at the Charity VAT & Tax Conference on 17 October. To book your place visit Civil Society Events.

Directory: haysmacintyre
Who's Who: Graham Elliott

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.