Compact Voice urges Pickles to emphasise the Compact to local councils 2

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 23 Aug 2011

Compact Voice has written to Eric Pickles, secretary of state for communities and local government, urging him to write to local authority chief executives to emphasise support for the Compact.

Simon Blake, chair of Compact Voice, warns Pickles in the letter that his expectations of some local council’s relationship with the voluntary sector are not being met.

Last year, at an NCVO conference, Pickles told councils to “resist any temptation to pull up the drawbridge on the voluntary sector and pass on disproportionate cuts”.

However, in the letter, which is co-signed by the chief executives of Acevo, Navca, NCVO and Volunteering England, Blake cites research from Compact Voice which shows many councils are ignoring this advice.

The research finds that in over half of local areas that responded to Compact Voice, voluntary sector funding had been cut disproportionally, when compared to reductions in council grant settlements.

Also, some 63 per cent of all local councils failed to respond to Compact Voice, despite the legal requirement to do so under the Freedom of Informtion Act.

Blake urges Pickles to show commitment to the Compact by ensuring it is a central to policies, ensuring his forthcoming Best Value guidance, which will be a one-page statutory guide on how councils should make cuts to the voluntary sector, includes the Compact. The letter also urges Pickles to write to each local authority chief executive.

Directory: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

Place a comment

Don Birnam
25 Aug 2011

The Compact? Compact Voice? Less than the dust beneath thy chariot wheel.

[Reply]

Samantha Jones
23 Aug 2011

Is government ever going to take the Compact seriously? All of this perpetuates what is an all-too-common perception that the charity sector is not a professional entity and makes believe the government sees it as something to fob off with as few resources and as little commitment as possible. Time to step up on this issue.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.