Share

Community groups to be charged 1 per cent of income to play music

Community groups to be charged 1 per cent of income to play music
News

Community groups to be charged 1 per cent of income to play music 5

Finance | Gareth Jones | 25 Jul 2011

Community groups have expressed their dismay after music licensing group PPL announced that they would have to pay 1 per cent of their “defined income” in order to play music at licensed events.

The Community Sector Law Monitoring Group (CSLMG) said campaigners are “furious” that PPL had announced the charge when it considered negotiations to be ongoing.

The Group has been in discussions with PPL on the change for the past two years, in which it has argued that community groups cannot afford the fees.

PPL’s newly-announced 1 per cent charge applies to organisations with income above £10,000; those below will pay a flat year annual fee of £42, an amount which had been agreed with the CSLMG.

These fees will be in addition to those that will be levied by the PRS, the other main music licensing organisation.

Defined income, according to PPL, is that received from the likes of door, food and bar takings, building hire charges and subscriptions, and excluding VAT, capital grants, revenue grants, interest from accounts, gifts and donations.

The changes come after the government removed voluntary and community organisations’ statutory exemption from licensing charges, although the licensing bodies agreed to delay the implementation of a charge until 1 January 2012.

Discussions “were moving forward”

In a letter to PPL, CSLMG’s chair and Community Matters chief executive David Tyler said: “We all felt that our discussions with PPL were moving forward and that this was encouraged by PPL asking us to provide more information at each meeting.

“We have all invested considerable time and effort into substantiating our proposals for further improvements to a community buildings tariff and understood that you were considering them very seriously. As your letter makes no reference to our proposals, I now have to wonder whether this was really the case.”

He later added: “We have not been fighting these charges out of a sense of entitlement but because many of our members simply cannot afford to pay for them.

"To a group with an income of £50,000 a year, a total of £1,000 on music fees is a great deal of money and often the difference between running a service or not.

"Furthermore the charges have no relationship to the amount of music a community group is likely to play; it’s just a way of wringing more money out of small charities.”

Similar scheme for buildings

In a statement, PPL denied that CSLMG had not agreed the change, and said it was disappointed with the Group's comments. 

“CSLMG requested a joint licensing scheme that was easy to administer and with a level of fees that was appropriate to their members' use of recorded music. 

“The equivalent PRS for Music scheme, based on 1 per cent of community buildings’ income, had been agreed by CSLMG and has been in operation for ten years.  

“PPL therefore agreed with CSLMG to follow similar lines for its own scheme.”

Gareth Jones
Senior reporter
Civil Society Media
26 Jul 2011

In response to some of the comments below, I have sought clarification on this and can confirm that the fee is 1% of defined income, rather than the full income of the charity. I will look at updating the above story as well.

For those that don't know what defined income is, here is a definition courtesy of Community Matters:

"Income should include: door takings and similar takings of the host voluntary organisation (the community association or management committee); hiring charges received from hirers of the building (but not the door takings of those hirers if retained by them); subscriptions; and the net contribution from food and bar takings where they accrue to the voluntary organisation.

"Income should NOT include: Value Added Tax; capital grants; revenue grants; interest from accounts; gifts and donations."

Auet Melache
EDISN
25 Jul 2011

You talk about a licence to play recorded music! but in fact are we talking about a Copy Right Licence to play music in community events? My Question? If Charities are to pay fees to play recorded music and it's in direct regard to Copy Right recorded music then How do You intend to inforce a licence fee of other minorities copy right recorded music that are no of copy right protected in UK?

NB:In some Ethnic communities and especially British Born and raised children/youth's taste in music is not that of the parental ethnic background but that of the society they live in and are well encouraged to Integrate. if this small underfounded community that work to wards a great commmunity intgration and cohesion can't play english Recorded Music as they can't afford to pay the Licence, it surely has a negative effect in great work they do to fullfill a sense of community inclusion within the ethos of a BIG SOCIATY!!!!! :(

Michael Walker-smith
business development manager
royal hospital chelsea
25 Jul 2011

Can I assume that this is on Event income only and not on all income?
I can understand for simplicity why PPL wants to base its charge on income but it should be only on enet income and then perhaps !5 is more reasonable but as I haven't worked the implication for the variuos charities I am involved in I don't know whetehr this should be 1% or 0.1% or what in between.

Any comments/updates/

Katrina Wade
Treasurer
Youth Enquiry Service Brixham
25 Jul 2011

This needs more information. The new charge seems to be for recorded music, we use mainly live music how will we be affected. Also the PRS charge is 1% of the profit made on musical events and specifically doesn't include income from room hire, grants or donations. Is the new PPL charge trying to snatch 1% of donations & grants? and how will I account for that with grants that are ring-fenced!

Ben Wittenberg
DSC
25 Jul 2011

Set up a new charity, contract it to deliver your events for £42, then play all the music you want;)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

emailalert

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Public thinks volunteers more worthy of honours than charity professionals

23 May 2012

New research released by nfpSynergy claims that almost half the British public think that voluntary sector...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Risk guide launched for charities going through structural changes

23 May 2012

Charity insurance specialist Ecclesiastical has published a risk guide for charities which are undertaking...

DEC appoints Saleh Saeed as new CEO

23 May 2012

The Disasters Emergency Committee has appointed Saleh Saeed as chief executive to take over when current...

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Marketers voice concerns over email conversion rates

21 May 2012

Conversion rates are the biggest concern for nearly half of all email marketers surveyed by the Direct...

Samsung launches Olympics app to fundraise for Kids Company

16 May 2012

Samsung has launched the Hope Relay mobile app to raise money for three charities including Kids Company,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance