Curley asks whether National Citizen Service is justified

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 6 Jul 2011

Kevin Curley, chief executive of Navca, has asked MPs whether the government’s new volunteering scheme National Citizen Service is justified alongside the loss of support for volunteering at local levels.

Curley was speaking at a Public Administration Select Committee on the Big Society, where he was asked by MPs to give examples of cuts to the charity sector.

Curley said that all local authority support for youth volunteering in areas such as Liverpool and Swindon had ended: “Putting this alongside the cost of National Citizen Service, does it justify all the pain of the loss of support for volunteering at a local level?” he asked.

He added: “There is a mismatch between the attractive rhetoric of the Big Society and the reality of what’s happening with local authorities withdrawing support.”

Last year, over half of Navca members expressed uncertainty about National Citizen Service.

The government has dedicated £13m for the scheme in 2011, and £37m in 2012, aiming for 10,000 participants this summer and 30,000 next year.

Directory: National Association of Voluntary and Community Action
Who's Who: Kevin Curley

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.