Latest guidance on internships

Latest guidance on internships
Technical briefing

Latest guidance on internships

Finance | Louise Fernandes-Owen | 22 Sep 2011

Should your interns be earning the national minimum wage? Louise Fernandes-Owen summarises recent guidance from both the government and the Gateways to the Professions Collaborative Forum.

Internships are on the rise. Whether this is in response to the Big Society or the economic climate, interns are an increasingly common feature of the workplace. Earlier this year, the Gateways to the Professions Collaborative Forum published the Best Practice Code for High-Quality Internships (the Code).  The Government has now also published updated guidance on the National Minimum Wage (NMW), clarifying when interns should receive the NMW.


There is no specific legal definition of ‘intern’ and interns may in fact be ‘employees’ or ‘workers’, attracting greater employment rights than first anticipated. ‘Employees’ are individuals who have entered into or work under a contract of employment. This involves personal service and mutuality of obligation. Employees have various rights, including the right to claim unfair dismissal.  

The wider definition of ‘worker’ includes employees and also individuals who have entered into or work under any other contract whereby they undertake to do or perform work or services personally.  Workers are entitled to the NMW.

The Code

The Code includes guidance for employers on preparing for internships; providing fair and equal access to internships; offering work that will develop interns’ skills and implementing supervision/mentoring throughout the process. The Code contains six best practice principles: preparation; recruitment; induction; treatment; supervision/mentoring; and certification, reference and feedback.

Government guidance

The Government’s guidance includes advice on whether interns should receive the NMW. The guidance confirms that “intern” has no legal status under NMW legislation and entitlement to the NMW does not depend on job titles, the type of work undertaken, how the work is described (e.g. “unpaid” or “expenses only”) or the relevant profession/sector. It states that what matters is whether the agreement or arrangement with an organisation qualifies interns as workers for NMW purposes.

Under NMW legislation, workers are entitled to the NMW, unless an exemption applies. Exemptions may apply to internships. For example, workers undertaking work experience placements not exceeding one year as part of higher education courses do not qualify for the NMW.

The guidance also covers the two separate categories of “volunteers” and “voluntary workers”. It states that volunteers are not workers and are not entitled to the NMW. However, it acknowledges that job titles are not conclusive and volunteers may be workers depending on the arrangements. "Voluntary workers" (i.e. employed by a charity, voluntary organisation, associated fund-raising body or statutory body) do not qualify for the NMW if they do not receive monetary payments, other than reimbursement of expenses actually, or reasonably estimated as likely to have been, incurred in the performance of their duties; or benefits in kind, other than reasonable subsistence or accommodation.


There has been pressure for greater clarity concerning interns' rights. Employers may therefore welcome both the Code and guidance, particularly the latter's NMW worker checklist and case studies illustrating whether workers are entitled to the NMW. However, the core message remains the same: job titles are not conclusive and arrangements should be reviewed to ensure that all aspects of internships are clarified from the outset.

Louise Fernandes-Owen is a senior associate at Field Fisher Waterhouse


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close ยป

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.