The full text of NCIA's letter to sector umbrella bodies about the Compact 1

Finance | 20 Jan 2010

The National Coalition for Independent Action today released an open letter to the chief executives of the five national bodies which have endorsed the revised National Compact, launched on 16 December. The full text of the letter reads:

“19/1/10

Dear Stephen, Debra, Stuart, Kevin and Justin,

We write this open letter to you, having been confronted by your ringing endorsement of the ‘Refreshed Compact’. Over here at the NCIA we have long taken a critical view, both of the Compact and the industry that has been created to promote its goodness and effectiveness. Nothing has changed in that department. The Compact is still a fig leaf for unequal power relationships.

But the reason why we are now spending time on it is because the whole ‘refresh’ process, culminating in the December 16th launch and your own contribution to this, so vividly illustrates what we have been complaining about in the sector for the last three years. The relentless orthodoxy that there is only good news out there; that the sector is thriving and partnerships with government and their agents at local level are harmonious, successful and effective; and, that any disagreement with this version of events is seen off as misinformed, mischief-making or ignorant.

What we see is a rather different picture, in which a large amount of public money has now been spent on the Compact good news industry, and where the new version of the document:

  • pretty faithfully reflects what the government wants it to say
  • was built on a grossly inadequate consultation exercise (79 responses from 179,000 charities - never mind the hundreds of thousands of non-charitable community groups) and involved ignoring the views and recommendations of some of those most closely involved in the process (via the Compact Refresh Panel)
  • has ended up with a worse document to the one that preceded it, which focuses on the procurement/contract/privatisation agenda, marginalises (again) the community sector, and totally dumps equalities issues
  • retains the voluntary code idea that all good people will, of course, take their Compact obligations seriously, so obviously flying in the face of the evidence
  • and, to add a chilling Orwellian echo, promotes the reclassification from the Single Equalities Bill of 'people with protected characteristics'.

Meanwhile state agencies (right up to the OTS Minister herself) continue to ignore or flout Compact compliance and the bulk of the sector remains quite unsurprised by all this, having long since realised that the Compact, despite its tactical use by a few plucky local activists, is hardly at the cutting edge of helpfulness in their relationship with statutory agencies.

Even the evident focus on public service privatisation and the sector’s assumed role in this, is naïve and will be seen to be ironic, for 2010 will see the beginning of savage public expenditure cuts. Even now, Government lawyers, civil servants and officers at all levels of the statutory sector will be busy identifying any devices that can be used to remove or reduce funding, interfere with operational ‘efficiency’, require increased outputs and outcomes, tighten performance management, defer or avoid paying for necessary cost increases, or drive a harder bargain in new contracts. Voluntary organisation contractors will feel this thumb on their collar. Many will experience for the first time the double whammy of losing their independence and finding themselves legally responsible for providing public services without the means to do so. Moaning then about what isn’t in the Compact, or lack of compliance with what is in it, will not get them very far.
 
The effects of the recession will also be felt by the largely unfunded, volunteer-based, community sector, which has remained marginalised, despite the lip service paid to empowerment and citizen involvement. These groups, involved with deprived or marginalised communities, will find an increase in demand for their support from people and neighbourhoods experiencing hardship. The new Compact has absolutely no relevance at all for this vast and valuable national resource.

We know that there are dissenting views amongst yourselves, amongst your members (where you have them) and elsewhere in the sector. So where are these views represented; where is the plain speaking that is needed? Where are the riches of diversity, so often celebrated as the “unique selling point” of voluntary action?

The relationship between the state and our world of voluntary action is in crisis right now. And whilst we, in the NCIA, don’t pretend that we have all the answers, we are going to carry on telling the truth as we see it, and holding you and your organisations to account when we get the chance.  If you want to be able to say that you ‘represent’ the voluntary and community sector, you are going to have to do better than this supine spin. We look forward to a response, which we are keen to receive.

Yours sincerely,


Andy Benson
Joint Convenor NCIA”

Share

The full text of NCIA's letter to sector umbrella bodies about the Compact

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Steve
Secretary
21 Jan 2010

Once again, Andy Benson and his colleagues at NCIA have hit the nail pretty squarely on the head. The relentless process of incorporating the Voluntary Sector into a semi-privatised, semi-QUANGOised and entirelty subservient network of service providers working under contract to and direction from state agencies has been going on for well over two decades. It is now so firmly established that a whole generation of people, in the Voluntary Sector as well as the statutory sector, reard it as the norm and may even have difficulty grasping the concept of truly independent voluntary agencies which actually challenge local or regional statutury agencies and promote independent views and policies.

Such is the state of the Voluntary Sector after thirty-one years of Thatcherism (thirteen of them under New Labour). Surely it is about time we stopped believing that anyone in the present government (or the likely alternative who will take office in May) have any commitment to, or even understanding of, the need for a healthy and independent Civil Society underpinned by an active Voluntary Sector.

Getting better connected: the Charity CRM Survey 2010

1 Mar 2010

Some 66 per cent of charities would recommend their supplier to other charities, up from 63 per cent last...

Jenny Searle on representing IT on the Leonard Cheshire board

1 Mar 2010

Leonard Cheshire Disability vice-chair and IT specialist Jenny Searle talks to Gareth Jones about the...

Should civil society organisations upgrade to Windows 7?

1 Mar 2010

We asked four experts to give their opinions on Windows 7 and whether organisations should be looking...

Options for mergers and collaborations

19 Feb 2010

To merge or not to merge? There are plenty of options open to charities that want to strengthen their...

Assessing your charity's solvency for Sorp

19 Feb 2010

Being realistic in tough times Trustees are required make a realistic assessment of their charity’s...

New rules on disclosure of directors' addresses with Companies House

19 Feb 2010

From 1st October 2009 every director must provide the registrar of Companies House with both their usual...

The longest winter: Are lifetime legacies ready to come in from the cold?

8 Mar 2010

Lifetime legacies are a giving mechanism that have been a glint in the eye of fundraisers for years. But...

The $93 Club and the 4Cs of online fundraising

8 Mar 2010

Fundraisers cannot apply traditional campaign methods to the new breed of online community fundraising,...

Communication breakdown: How donors react to charity communications

8 Mar 2010

Last year more than a third of donors stopped giving to their regular charity. In research revealed exclusively...