Share

Recent rally recedes: Charity 250 Index

Recent rally recedes: Charity 250 Index
Charity Index

Recent rally recedes: Charity 250 Index

Finance | Diane Sim | 8 Mar 2012

Last year’s recovery of the Charity 250 Index and the upturn in voluntary income have both been short-lived, writes Diane Sim.

 >> Download Charity 250 Index March 2012 as .pdf<<

The positive upturn in the fortunes of the Charity 250 Index at the end of last year, when it outperformed both its quarterly and annual benchmarks, has sadly not been sustained. With the addition of over 100 charities with financial year-ends up to and including 31 March 2011, the Index has fallen back to the below-par performance that has characterised most of the last two years.

The Charity 250 Index rose by 41 points in the first quarter of 2011, some 15 points behind its average quarterly rise of 56 points. Income from legacies and trading operations outperformed their quarterly average rises by 104 points and 47 points respectively. However, this was not sufficient to offset below-average performance from voluntary income, investment income and grants and fees, which lagged their average quarterly rises by 53, 28 and 18 points respectively.

A similar pattern is discernible in the annual data: in the year to 31 March 2011 the Charity 250 Index rose 96 points, some 31 points behind its average annual rise of 127 points. All income streams underperformed their annual averages with the exception of legacies, which outperformed its annual average rise by 118 points. Charities reporting significant increases in legacy income in the year under review include the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, the YMCA and the Children’s Trust.

figure 1

The biggest disappointment in the Charity 250 Index data for the first quarter of 2011 is the fall-off in voluntary income, which for charities reporting in the fourth quarter of 2010 had shown definite signs of recovery. A notable casualty is the Disasters Emergency Committee, which reported a 34 per cent decrease in voluntary income, resulting in a 33 per cent fall in income overall.

While it would be comforting to see this quarter as the blip, and last quarter as the trend, this quarter sees almost half of the Charity 250 Index members reporting their figures and, as such, provides a much more telling indicator of the health of the Index as a whole.

Not all is doom and gloom in the area of voluntary income of course: CLIC Sargent Cancer Care for Children reported a 61 per cent increase in voluntary income, which contributed to a 44 per cent increase in its income overall. Similarly St Dunstan’s, which supports former servicemen and women suffering from blindness, posted a 51 per cent increase in voluntary income and a 33 per cent increase in income overall.

However, most of the charities reporting overall income increases of 20 per cent or more in the quarter to 31 March 2011 are heavily reliant on income gains from grants and fees – an income stream, which is itself increasingly under pressure. This includes some of the larger players in the Charity 250 Index such as Alternative Futures, Crime Reduction Initiatives and the Federation of Groundwork Trusts, to name but a few. 

 >> Download Charity 250 Index March 2012 as .pdf<<

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.