Share

Could personalisation be a way of quantifying social impact?

Could personalisation be a way of quantifying social impact?
Blogs

Could personalisation be a way of quantifying social impact?1

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 18 Nov 2009

Last week, Bridges Ventures announced its very first investment into Call Britannia. The financial bible FT covered the news enthusiastically and positively, but it also described social investment overall as “notoriously woolly”.

And of course it is compared with the hard facts of numbers. But like law, a discipline which relies on careful interpretation and precedents, social investment can develop an understandable measure for proving social value, although it won’t be as clear-cut as making a profit.

Money talks, but love can move mountains. I attended Rathbone's Green Dragons Den last week where five keen social entrepreneurs made their case to an audience of investors who would invest in their favourite idea with “Rathbone dollars”. Pitches ranged from environmental technologies to microfinance loan initiatives.

Social Impact Bonds, developed by Social Finance, received the highest investment of £15m. This didn’t surprise me - the idea is to raise investment to fund preventative programmes, investors receive returns from government on the basis of improved social outcomes, such as reduced reoffending.

Speaking to people shortly after the pitches, it was clear the idea of using investment to improve society was compelling. Some didn’t fully understand how it would work, but it had certainly captured the imagination.

And this week, Acevo has ramped up the call for personalisation, releasing an interim report from the Commission on Personalisation.

It has called the drive to give service users control of where money for their care is spent - a social market revolution.

And that it could be. The positives of personalisation oft repeated include empowerment for service users, and greater accountability for providers.

But another positive aspect is this could become a true indicator of social value. We can never measure 100 per cent how people feel, but we can quantify how people spend.

Could charities use this as a way of demonstrating their social value? If more service users chose them over others as the culture of personalisation spread – could this be used to show investors social impact in their favourite language - numbers?

John Woodruff
Treasurer
Independent Options (Stockport) Ltd
19 Nov 2009

The views expressed here are mine personally and not those of the Trustees or Management of Independent Options (Stockport) Ltd.

I wholheartedly agree with the proposition that personalisation, coupled with putting the money to purchase services into the hands of users, is an excellent way of measuring the social value of providers. One big barrier, however, is the reluctance on the part of certain local authorities to let go of the purse strings because it takes away their power and runs against their belief that "nanny state" knows best. If Central Government could place more pressure on Local Councils to, for example, implement individual budgets faster by setting aggressive targets and policing them, then this would go a long way to achieving what all of us in the third sector want: namely, efficiently delivered services that users and their families actually want.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Vibeka Mair

Vibeka Mair is a senior reporter for Civil Society.

Follow on Twitter
@vibeka

Ian Allsop (49) David Davison (42) John Tate (41) Robert Ashton (30) Tania Mason (22) Paul Bennett (22) Gordon Hunter (17) Daniel Phelan (13) Vibeka Mair (9) David Philpott (9)
Gareth Jones (8) Andrew Hind CB (8) Celina Ribeiro (7) Niki May Young (7) Andrew Chaggar (5) James Brooke Turner (4) Sir Stuart Etherington (4) Rui Domingues (4) Jeremy Swain (3) Garreth Spillane (3) Alistair Gibbons (3) Claris D'cruz (2) Kate Sayer (2) Richard Maitland (2) Adrian Beney (2) Iain Pritchard (2) Daniel Fletcher (2) Martin Brookes (2) Tesse Akpeki (2) Hal Broadbent (2) Stephen Hammersley (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Belinda Pratten (2) Simon Steeden (2) Mark Astarita (1) Don Bawtree (1) Tim Brown (1) Sir Stephen Bubb (1) Victoria Cook (1) Lindsay Gray (1) Nick Ivey (1) Iona Joy (1) John Kelly (1) Heather Lamont (1) Stephen Lloyd (1) Lucy McLynn (1) Chris Oulton (1) Julian Rathbone (1) Peter Scott (1) Socrates Socratous (1) Richard Weaver (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Roger Chester (1) Matthew Bowcock (1) Pauline Broomhead (1) Reuben Turner (1) Martin Farrell (1) Paul Gibson (1) Becky Slack (1) Jonathon Grapsas (1) Andrew Scadding (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Su Sayer (1) Martin Birch (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Sara Llewellin (1) John Low (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Ruth Murphy (1) Colin Nee (1) Sally O’Neill (1) Julia Unwin (1) Kate Rogers (1) Malcolm Hayday (1) Nick Brooks (1) Nick Wilkie (1) Filippo Addarii (1) Kimberley Scharf (1) Jakes Ferguson (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Joe Turner (1) Rob Dyson (1) Nick Cater (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Andy Williamson (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andrew Samuel (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Paul Amadi (1) Kirsty Weakley (1) Neil Mapes (1) Dan Corry (1) Peter Holbrook (1) Peter Mitchell (1) Billy Dove (1) Andrew Ketteringham (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Lynne Robb (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Paul Emery (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Pesh Framjee (1) Sukhvinder Kaur-Stubbs (1) Vicki Prout (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Paul Farmer (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) Jonathan Bruck (1)
Less +++ More +++

I have a question…don't laugh

23 May 2013

Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.

App-solutely challenging

9 May 2013

As one of a team of eight corporate graduate volunteers partnered with a small charity to develop a mobile...

Tablets: the end of an era?

9 May 2013

John Tate asks whether the inexorable rise of the tablet will spell the end for the humble PC.

Film of the week: Street Pastors - the Movie

24 May 2013

Every weekend, in town and city centres up and down the country, Street Pastors are offering people care,...

I have a question…don't laugh

23 May 2013

Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.

When ignorance is far from bliss

20 May 2013

A shifting political atmosphere is putting power in the hands of the inexperienced, warns Robert Ashton.