I have a question…don't laugh
23 May 2013
Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
Last week, Bridges Ventures announced its very first investment into Call Britannia. The financial bible FT covered the news enthusiastically and positively, but it also described social investment overall as “notoriously woolly”.
And of course it is compared with the hard facts of numbers. But like law, a discipline which relies on careful interpretation and precedents, social investment can develop an understandable measure for proving social value, although it won’t be as clear-cut as making a profit.
Money talks, but love can move mountains. I attended Rathbone's Green Dragons Den last week where five keen social entrepreneurs made their case to an audience of investors who would invest in their favourite idea with “Rathbone dollars”. Pitches ranged from environmental technologies to microfinance loan initiatives.
Social Impact Bonds, developed by Social Finance, received the highest investment of £15m. This didn’t surprise me - the idea is to raise investment to fund preventative programmes, investors receive returns from government on the basis of improved social outcomes, such as reduced reoffending.
Speaking to people shortly after the pitches, it was clear the idea of using investment to improve society was compelling. Some didn’t fully understand how it would work, but it had certainly captured the imagination.
And this week, Acevo has ramped up the call for personalisation, releasing an interim report from the Commission on Personalisation.
It has called the drive to give service users control of where money for their care is spent - a social market revolution.
And that it could be. The positives of personalisation oft repeated include empowerment for service users, and greater accountability for providers.
But another positive aspect is this could become a true indicator of social value. We can never measure 100 per cent how people feel, but we can quantify how people spend.
Could charities use this as a way of demonstrating their social value? If more service users chose them over others as the culture of personalisation spread – could this be used to show investors social impact in their favourite language - numbers?
23 May 2013
Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.
9 May 2013
As one of a team of eight corporate graduate volunteers partnered with a small charity to develop a mobile...
9 May 2013
John Tate asks whether the inexorable rise of the tablet will spell the end for the humble PC.
24 May 2013
Every weekend, in town and city centres up and down the country, Street Pastors are offering people care,...
23 May 2013
Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.
20 May 2013
A shifting political atmosphere is putting power in the hands of the inexperienced, warns Robert Ashton.
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
27 Nov 2013
Charity Finance (with optional website)
from £119.00
BUY NOW
John Woodruff
Treasurer
Independent Options (Stockport) Ltd
19 Nov 2009
The views expressed here are mine personally and not those of the Trustees or Management of Independent Options (Stockport) Ltd.
I wholheartedly agree with the proposition that personalisation, coupled with putting the money to purchase services into the hands of users, is an excellent way of measuring the social value of providers. One big barrier, however, is the reluctance on the part of certain local authorities to let go of the purse strings because it takes away their power and runs against their belief that "nanny state" knows best. If Central Government could place more pressure on Local Councils to, for example, implement individual budgets faster by setting aggressive targets and policing them, then this would go a long way to achieving what all of us in the third sector want: namely, efficiently delivered services that users and their families actually want.
[Reply]