Charity league tables are coming whether you like them or not

Charity league tables are coming whether you like them or not

Charity league tables are coming whether you like them or not2

Finance | Tania Mason | 19 Jun 2011

Acceptance is growing of the idea of comparisons between organisations in the sector, says Tania Mason.

The welfare-to-work charity Tomorrow’s People deserves a standing ovation for the trailblazing work it has done to quantify the value of its work to society, published in a 109-page report launched last week at the hopefully auspicious surroundings of the Bank of England.

Of course, it had the benefit of many hours of free help from some highly-qualified consultants at FTI Consulting, brokered onto the project by Pro Bono Economics, but the analysis also required a great deal of extra work by the charity itself.  Its chief executive, the affable and effervescent Baroness Stedman-Scott, described the data-collection required for the report as a “stretching exercise” for the organisation.

One of the things it did was to telephone 2,000 former clients to find out what had happened to them after they were found work by Tomorrow’s People – whether they were still in that job, had gone onto another job, or had fallen back into the benefits system.  This helped to establish the sustainability of the assistance provided by the charity, and meant the analysts were better able to estimate the income tax receipts generated, the savings in welfare benefits, and the ensuing lesser demands on the health and criminal justice systems.

Tomorrow’s People now hopes to use this report to persuade funders to stump up more cash so it can scale up its services and help more people find work. It will also use it when tendering for statutory contracts; as the Baroness said, tenders should be awarded based on value, not just on price. And with this report, Tomorrow’s People has a great story to tell and proper numbers to back it up.

But the real value of this kind of impact assessment only comes when the numbers can be compared with equivalent numbers from other organisations working in the same space. Public service commissioners can only really make the best judgements on value provided by bidders if those bidders have all undergone similar analyses, using comparable data sets and methodologies. Ideally, funders need to be able to weigh apples against apples.

So confident is she in her organisation’s work, Baroness Stedman-Scott is 100 per cent behind this concept. Not only does she want other welfare-to-work charities to follow the lead of Tomorrow’s People and report their own outcomes, she wants to see a “social FTSE” in the financial pages of newspapers, ranking the biggest civil society organisations according to the value they provide to society.

In public, few would dispute the benefit of this level of transparency. But the problem is that for every charity that is shown to be highly effective, there will be one that is less effective. That’s the nature of benchmarking – some are better than others. And therefore persuading those whose results are less good, to volunteer that information to funders, is like asking turkeys to vote for Christmas.

The Baroness knows this only too well.  When she was chair of ERSA, the trade body for welfare-to-work organisations, she tried to convince all its members to publish their outcomes data, but none except Tomorrow’s People would do so. 

Of course, there are pros and cons to benchmarking and still plenty of opposition within the sector by those who claim that results can be too easily manipulated, often to the detriment of the hardest-to-help beneficiaries. But after many years of utter rejection by charities of anything resembling league tables, a degree of acceptance finally seems to be taking hold. Even the Charity Commission is getting in on the act, looking at devising a consistent way for charities to allocate their costs within their accounts so it is easier for members of the public to discern how much of each donated pound is spent on ‘the cause’.

At Friday’s report launch, Filippo Cardini from the Towerbrook private equity firm declared that comparisons and benchmarking are perfectly normal in all other parts of our lives, and so civil society organisations must get used to the same scrutiny.

On one hand it seems a bit unfair that charities, set up for the purpose of helping others, should have to justify their expenditure to a public that doesn’t seem to give two hoots how private companies, set up to benefit a limited group of shareholders, distribute their incomes.

But at the end of the day the beneficiary is king, and if Charity A can deliver more effective services than Charity B, then their donors have a right to know. In the absence of greater merger and acquisition activity in the sector, it’s the best way of weeding out the weak and guaranteeing the survival of the fittest – and ensuring the most effective service models take root.

Howard Clark
21 Jun 2011

Benchmarking will kill creativity in achievement of purpose as organisations look to discover ways of scoring well on the league tables.

Their clients will suffer as public sector services users have suffered as mediocrity has killed innovation.

If the charity sector takes this route it will be taking a quick-bus over the cliff-edge

Neville Reid
Treasury Manager
Poplar HARCA
20 Jun 2011

If funding is going to follow statistical measures of effectiveness, this would create an incentive for charities to cherry-pick their clients. For instance, a welfare-to-work charity like the example above might try to avoid people with problematic histories (drugs, prison, mental health problems...). Raw indicators don't show whether differences in outcomes are attributable to differences between client groups or to the skills etc of the charities.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tania Mason

Tania Mason is group editor at Civil Society Media. She has been a journalist for 20-odd years and has specialised in the charity sector since 2003.

Follow Tania on Twitter @taniamason

Ian Allsop (68) John Tate (58) David Davison (51) Robert Ashton (42) Tania Mason (24) Andrew Hind CB (23) Gordon Hunter (17) Daniel Phelan (15) David Ainsworth (14) Vibeka Mair (12)
David Philpott (10) Celina Ribeiro (8) Niki May Young (8) Rui Domingues (8) Andrew Chaggar (5) James Brooke Turner (4) Sir Stuart Etherington (4) Kate Sayer (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Garreth Spillane (3) Alistair Gibbons (3) Ian Clark (3) Claris D'cruz (2) Stephen Lloyd (2) Richard Maitland (2) Adrian Beney (2) Iain Pritchard (2) Pauline Broomhead (2) Martin Brookes (2) Tesse Akpeki (2) Nick Brooks (2) Stephen Hammersley (2) Geetha Rabindrakumar (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Kirsty Weakley (2) Dan Corry (2) Peter Holbrook (2) Belinda Pratten (2) Simon Steeden (2) Jonathan Bruck (2) Dan Gregory (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Mark Astarita (1) Don Bawtree (1) Sir Stephen Bubb (1) Victoria Cook (1) Lindsay Gray (1) Rachel Holmes (1) Nick Ivey (1) Iona Joy (1) John Kelly (1) Michael King (1) Heather Lamont (1) Lucy McLynn (1) Chris Oulton (1) Julian Rathbone (1) Socrates Socratous (1) Richard Weaver (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Roger Chester (1) Matthew Bowcock (1) Joe Saxton (1) Reuben Turner (1) Martin Farrell (1) Paul Gibson (1) Jonathon Grapsas (1) Andrew Scadding (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Su Sayer (1) Debra Allcock Tyler (1) Martin Birch (1) Mark Hallam (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Sara Llewellin (1) John Low (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Ruth Murphy (1) Colin Nee (1) Julia Unwin (1) Kate Rogers (1) Malcolm Hayday (1) Filippo Addarii (1) Kimberley Scharf (1) Jakes Ferguson (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Joe Turner (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Rosie Chapman (1) Andy Williamson (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andrew Samuel (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Paul Amadi (1) Luke Fletcher (1) Peter Mitchell (1) Billy Dove (1) Andrew Ketteringham (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Lynne Robb (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Paul Emery (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Pesh Framjee (1) Sukhvinder Kaur-Stubbs (1) Moira Protani (1) Vicki Prout (1) Michael O'Toole (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Paul Farmer (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) Logan Anderson (1) Andy Rich (1) Sharon Martin (1) Asheem Singh (1) Leigh Daynes (1) Abdurahman Sharif (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Richard Caulfield (1) Carolyn Sims (1) Ashley Horsey (1) Andrew O'Brien (1)
Less +++ More +++

Social Charity Spy: Charities’ online response to the Nepal Earthquake

1 May 2015

The Disasters Emergency Committee, ActionAid and Save the Children have been making full use of social...

Technology lessons from down the ages

1 May 2015

Holiday technology frustrations remind John Tate of some important IT rules.

Social Charity Spy: Anne Frank Trust UK with #notsilent and Shelter plays political bingo

17 Apr 2015

This week we highlight the Anne Frank Trust UK’s use of social video to commemorate the 70th anniversary...

Society Diary: Duck lanes on the towpath and the lamest excuses for late filing

22 May 2015

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

The voluntary sector needs to fight for the Human Rights Act

21 May 2015

The government’s attempts to repeal the Human Rights Act is not just a problem for civil liberties charities...

The coalition and the charity sector: what were the highs and lows?

7 May 2015

The coalition government draws to a close today, following five years in which it has often had a turbulent...