Dodgy politics

Dodgy politics

Dodgy politics

Finance | Ian Allsop | 4 May 2012

Government incompetence over the tax relief cap gets Ian Allsop very hot under the collar.

I don’t usually get irate. Not even David Cameron gets me properly angry. He irritates, bemuses and frustrates but I find it hard to get really steamed up by him. But he and his chums have certainly ruffled a few charity sector feathers with their recent incomparable governing.

Indeed, by the time this is published the entire government may well have been brought down by carefully considered arguments and controlled fury from civil society leaders.

I met Cameron once. At a charity. I say met him; I passed him and his family at the Natural History Museum. My youngest, who was then almost two, was charging down the corridor and nearly knocked over the then leader of the opposition (without any prompting from me). At least that was how I mentally stored the encounter away for future recounting.

But even then I instinctively knew that this was a tale that would grow in the telling and be interpreted according to how history dictated it best. Did Alex nearly knock him over or was it the other way round?

In my memory I see Dave striding purposefully towards us, a steely glint of malice in his eye, the look of a man who wasn’t going to alter his line but expected everyone else to move according to his wishes. The only benefit I could see of him ever becoming PM at that point was it would at least add a level of quality to the anecdote in the future.

It wasn’t the first time my family had encountered Dave. My uncle runs a burger van on Cornwall’s north coast and Cameron once bought a cup of tea there while on holiday.

It is highly possible that he made a mental note to “have a word with George about the VAT on those if we get into power” when spotting the tepid pasties being eaten by fellow customers.

But the budget brought much more than that to get reheated under the collar about. This government is now officially operating at a level of incompetence way outside its comfort zone of simply bumbling along.

The tax relief cap on donations by higher-rate tax payers prompted calls for George to ‘give it back’, amid fears of the effect this would have on giving levels. Things really got interesting when the government tried to justify the cap on the grounds that philanthropists are giving money to dodgy charities to avoid tax.

It was a classic piece of lazy government slurring. They have become experts at demonising whole groups of people as scroungers, for example benefit claimants and the disabled, based on the misdeeds of the few.

Instead of tackling head on a problem that exists in a minority of cases, it is much easier to apply a blanket solution that targets everyone. Clearly if there are philanthropists giving money to sham charities this should be addressed through the appropriate channels. If only there was a regulator which had the powers to do this.

It shouldn’t be dealt with by imposing rules that tar the reputation of genuine philanthropists without supporting evidence.

The sector exploded with wrath. Sir Stephen Bubb threw his toys so far out of his pram that they went into orbit and he famously offered to give his knighthood back in protest on Newsnight, but I may have imagined that.

Spare a thought for Nick

It is worth remembering at this point the comments Nick Hurd made at the CFG dinner last November about the government wanting to take giving to new levels. Alas, I am not sure he meant it quite in this way.

Poor old Mr Hurd. It can’t be easy supporting the sector when your bosses are living in their own little bubble and introducing ill-thought out measures, seemingly without any discussion or consultation.

At least the whole kerfuffle has sparked honest and sensible debate about whether spending priorities should be determined by the whims of the rich few, rather than through taxation, but it was hardly the intended outcome.

If the government really believes there is a problem with dodgy charities it should have been raised sensibly through reasoned dialogue. Instead it has been blurted out in an attempt to shore up the rationale for a pronouncement that could adversely affect donations to charity at a time when government policy in other areas mean they are more vital than ever.

It has become too easy to say that this government is out of touch, but in the case of charities it seems once again that is the case. Despite the fact that the man leading it was educated at one. Or is that because of? 



[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Ian Allsop

Ian Allsop is a freelance journalist and editor specialising in not-for-profit management and financial issues.

Team talk and a CRM upgrade

19 Jul 2016

A CRM upgrade is not just about tech – you need to consider the effect on people, says Ivan Wainewright....

The ‘fake’ charity app scam could damage trust in charities

21 Jun 2016

Kirsty Weakley argues that if charities don’t understand what their technology partners are doing, they...

Environmentally-friendly printing - is it possible?

25 May 2016

SaxoPrint highlights how environmentally-friendly printing products and affordability for charities need...

Society Diary: Is a woman really shacked up with this dead philanthropist?

23 Sep 2016

Our weekly round-up of interesting and outlandish information, collected from the corners of the charity...

Dear Andrew: How do I deal with my board's poor attendance?

22 Sep 2016

In this regular column, Andrew Hind answers readers’ queries about governance issues. This week a trustee...

The regulator: Charities should get on the front foot

22 Sep 2016

Many charities have responded proactively to the recent media storm, and are stronger as a result, says...