Campaign travails

Campaign travails

Campaign travails

Finance | Ian Allsop | 28 Mar 2011

Ian Allsop gets on his soapbox to campaign for campaigning.

I sat down to write this column just after the earthquake in Japan and was preparing to pen a few words about charities and campaigning. This topic has again reared its head following the Public Administration Select Committee’s (PASC) public barbecuing of Sir Stuart Etherington in January.

The crux of it is that some MPs make a distinction between ‘good’ charities (who deliver services directly to beneficiaries) and ones that shout a lot. You know the type, those busy-body organisations who inconvenience busy people in positions of power, ie MPs, with press releases and letters (some of which are, disgracefully, not even signed with proper ink). they also take out big adverts in the papers trying to inform people of stuff just because they want to make the world a better place. How dare they, especially if in doing so they criticise the consequences of government policy.

But I did take a momentary pause and reacted as any columnist would to a major news story. Could I/should I write a piece about it? There are charity angles when things like this happen. For example, the perfectly legitimate debate about whether Japan, as a rich economy, needs or deserves the levels of disaster relief that, say, a Haiti does. And I was struck by the opportunistic yet understandable reaction to the unfolding nuclear crisis by the anti-nuclear lobby. However, some of the campaigning was shoddy.

One group, the Sun Day Campaign, claimed they had warned of such an event since before Chornobyl (sic), even though they were founded seven years after it happened. There were counterprotestations by the other side, who accused the anti-nuclear lobby of exploiting a tragic situation to make a “pathetic point”, thereby arguably exploiting a tragic situation to make their own.

Clearly, if voluntary groups are to spend money on campaigning, any such work has to be appropriate, truthful and well executed. There should be a campaign against bad campaigning.

It seems bizarre that the PASC should question whether campaigning to achieve positive change for beneficiaries is a good use of charitable resources. Perhaps MPs feel they should have a monopoly on spending large sums of money on campaigns to get the results they want.

I would have thought it intuitive that money spent on providing information aimed at changing behaviour is worth it. Even my six-year-old son understands it. He is developing a real passion for animals and is currently saving his pennies to save the panda. We were having a conversation about why the white rhino is endangered. He knows that it is hunted by those who believe its horn has medicinal properties. “But it doesn’t work Daddy. Why can’t someone just tell them this? Tell them not to kill them.” You see? Campaigning.

There is a lot of public anger over unpopular policy decisions currently (where Cam pain takes on a different meaning). And we have seen examples of campaigning on the global stage with regime change initiatives in Egypt, Bahrain and Libya. But the success of campaigning is hard to quantify. Some high-profile success stories cannot easily be attributed to one organisation but to a mix of factors and charities, such as the public-smoking-ban campaign. But if the public are to continue to support (and evidence suggests they do) charities using donations for such activities, the sector needs to communicate these wins clearly.

Perhaps the uncomfortable truth is that despite greater engagement with government, the sector has not been very good at getting its message across to those in power.

Therefore what is needed is a campaign to help people, especially politicians, understand the positive aspects of campaigning. And clear ways of measuring success. Otherwise, if the public starts to question the amount of cash involved, the sector will need a campaign to encourage campaigns about campaigning against those who say charities shouldn’t spend money on campaigning. Which won’t come cheap. And will require a lot of ink.

I will finish by launching a campaign about something close to my heart. I would like to offer my congratulations to Andrew Hind on becoming Charity Finance editor on a permanent basis as the springboard for my ‘please let me continue doing this column’ campaign. As I type, I wonder how he will edit this bit.

Seriously, Andrew has had a distinguished career, and after stoically undertaking such low-key roles as chief executive of the Charity Commission has finally landed the big one, which as he admits himself is the first step of a longer-term plan. To one day write this column. 

Ian Allsop is former editor of Civil Society's Charity Finance magazine


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Ian Allsop

Ian Allsop is a freelance journalist and editor specialising in not-for-profit management and financial issues.

Ian Allsop (68) John Tate (58) David Davison (51) Robert Ashton (42) Tania Mason (24) Andrew Hind CB (23) Gordon Hunter (17) Daniel Phelan (15) David Ainsworth (14) Vibeka Mair (12)
David Philpott (10) Celina Ribeiro (8) Niki May Young (8) Rui Domingues (8) Andrew Chaggar (5) James Brooke Turner (4) Sir Stuart Etherington (4) Kate Sayer (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Garreth Spillane (3) Alistair Gibbons (3) Ian Clark (3) Claris D'cruz (2) Stephen Lloyd (2) Richard Maitland (2) Adrian Beney (2) Iain Pritchard (2) Pauline Broomhead (2) Martin Brookes (2) Tesse Akpeki (2) Nick Brooks (2) Stephen Hammersley (2) Geetha Rabindrakumar (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Kirsty Weakley (2) Dan Corry (2) Peter Holbrook (2) Belinda Pratten (2) Simon Steeden (2) Jonathan Bruck (2) Dan Gregory (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Mark Astarita (1) Don Bawtree (1) Sir Stephen Bubb (1) Victoria Cook (1) Lindsay Gray (1) Rachel Holmes (1) Nick Ivey (1) Iona Joy (1) John Kelly (1) Michael King (1) Heather Lamont (1) Lucy McLynn (1) Chris Oulton (1) Julian Rathbone (1) Socrates Socratous (1) Richard Weaver (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Roger Chester (1) Matthew Bowcock (1) Joe Saxton (1) Reuben Turner (1) Martin Farrell (1) Paul Gibson (1) Jonathon Grapsas (1) Andrew Scadding (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Su Sayer (1) Debra Allcock Tyler (1) Martin Birch (1) Mark Hallam (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Sara Llewellin (1) John Low (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Ruth Murphy (1) Colin Nee (1) Julia Unwin (1) Kate Rogers (1) Malcolm Hayday (1) Filippo Addarii (1) Kimberley Scharf (1) Jakes Ferguson (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Joe Turner (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Rosie Chapman (1) Andy Williamson (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andrew Samuel (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Paul Amadi (1) Luke Fletcher (1) Peter Mitchell (1) Billy Dove (1) Andrew Ketteringham (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Lynne Robb (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Paul Emery (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Pesh Framjee (1) Sukhvinder Kaur-Stubbs (1) Moira Protani (1) Vicki Prout (1) Michael O'Toole (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Paul Farmer (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) Logan Anderson (1) Andy Rich (1) Sharon Martin (1) Asheem Singh (1) Leigh Daynes (1) Abdurahman Sharif (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Richard Caulfield (1) Carolyn Sims (1) Ashley Horsey (1) Andrew O'Brien (1)
Less +++ More +++

Ten tips for digital transformation at charities

27 May 2015

Last week Kirsty Weakley spent a day immersed in all things digital transformation at CharityComms' conference....

Social Charity Spy: Charities’ online response to the Nepal Earthquake

1 May 2015

The Disasters Emergency Committee, ActionAid and Save the Children have been making full use of social...

Technology lessons from down the ages

1 May 2015

Holiday technology frustrations remind John Tate of some important IT rules.

Society Diary: Duck lanes on the towpath and the lamest excuses for late filing

22 May 2015

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

The voluntary sector needs to fight for the Human Rights Act

21 May 2015

The government’s attempts to repeal the Human Rights Act is not just a problem for civil liberties charities...

The coalition and the charity sector: what were the highs and lows?

7 May 2015

The coalition government draws to a close today, following five years in which it has often had a turbulent...