Share

Pensions may be harmful to the future health of your organisation

Pensions may be harmful to the future health of your organisation
Blogs

Pensions may be harmful to the future health of your organisation

Finance | David Davison | 14 Sep 2010

Focus on pension shortfalls is growing, with the BBC's £2bn pension deficit hitting the news this week - our regular charity pension blogger David Davison looks at the dangers of out-sourcing pensions.

I read this really interesting article on a dispute between a district council and a housing association but it is a case which highlights some wider issues for employers in the third sector in relation to their pension provision and issues which will become more prevalent as ever increasing amounts of public services are out-sourced to the not-for-profit sector.

There needs to be complete transparency and clarity around pension provision as part of any out-sourcing arrangement and the contractual terms need to link up with any arrangements made with the pension scheme as in all likelihood these will be totally separate parties. This is a very complex area and suitable professional support, both legal and actuarial, is required to make sure all the issues are covered off. This could add some additional cost but it is likely to be a fraction of the likely cost which would be incurred if the agreement signed up to turns out to be wrong.

Organisations need to be totally clear about what liabilities they’re taking on and who is liable for additional costs should things change in the future. Many contracts require the new organisation to assume responsibility for pensions built up well before the organisation came in to existence and frequently of a value many times the size of the organisation.  In one recent example I’ve seen the charity have over 80% of its pension liabilities related to staff service prior to their formation, with a value in excess of 10 times that of the charities assets. There was also no agreement in place which compensated the charity should the cost of these liabilities turn out to be more than expected leaving the charity with a huge potential additional cost from existing revenue. A neat three card trick from the local council!!

Once the agreements are signed it is very difficult to go back to re-negotiate or to pursue additional support so this needs to be right first time. Even if operating to a tight timescale make sure this area gets the attention it deserves and nothing is signed until there is clarity. You definitely don’t want to get this wrong as it may well be the single area which exposes the organisation to the greatest risk of catastrophic failure.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

David  Davison

David is also director of Dalriada Trustees and Civil Society Media's dedicated pensions blogger.

Ian Allsop (41) David Davison (36) John Tate (32) Paul Bennett (22) Tania Mason (19) Gordon Hunter (17) Robert Ashton (15) Daniel Phelan (13) Gareth Jones (8) Vibeka Mair (6) Less +++ More +++

Raspbery Pi - the future of computing

4 May 2012

John Tate introduces the new big thing in the world of computing.

Would you donate your desktop to charity?

4 May 2012

Would you hand your PC desktop background over to advertisers if it was fundraising for a good cause?...

A solution to regulating society lotteries

26 Apr 2012

Inspired by a debate between Joe Saxton and an employee of the Gambling Commission, David Philpott devises...

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

Timeline: Coalition government so far

14 May 2012

It’s two years since Britain voted in the previously unlikely coalition of the Conservatives and Liberal...