Share

How will charities defend pension shortfalls to supporters?

How will charities defend pension shortfalls to supporters?
Blogs

How will charities defend pension shortfalls to supporters? 2

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 28 Jul 2010

As the Big Society brings more attention to the voluntary sector, charities will face more scrutiny on their finances, how will they excuse potential pension deficits asks Vibeka Mair.

Last week brought a sense of excitement for the charity sector. The coalition government’s Big Society plans propelled civil society into the forefront, with sector leaders and commentators filling the newspapers and airtime.

Ignoring the naysayers and sceptics of the Big Society for a moment, the plans could herald a new age for civil society, but with increased attention will come increased scrutiny.

Take two letters to the Times last week.

W.K.Shooter, an accountant, wrote to the Times complaining about what he felt were excessive wages at the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI):

 “28 individuals were earning between £60,000 and £79,999, and 40 earning between £60,000 and £139,999,” he said. “As I understand it there are many volunteers, and the lifeboat crews are paid very little. To whom then is this level of money paid and can it be justified?”

Philip Circus sent a letter in response to Shooter, complaining about pension shortfalls in the sector:

“The greatest scandal is the number of charities that still provide final-salary pensions for their staff,” he said. “Pension black holes are now common in charities and increasingly that is where the donations of supporters are going.”

While the relentless press flurry about high wages across sectors does not always trigger mass public outrage – take the head teacher paid £240,000 backed by parents and ousted BP chief Tony Hayward garnering support from Daily Mail readers for his £11m pay deal - can charities justify to supporters that some of their donation is filling what is essentially a debt?

This is especially pertinent in light of the recent Charity Commission’s latest trust and confidence report which revealed the most important factor for the public in trusting a charity is knowing that a reasonable proportion of their donation reaches the cause.

The true extent of pension deficits in the sector is unknown -  figures released by actuarial services company Alexander Forbes revealed that deficits from the sector’s 20 largest fundraising charities had grown to £720m by the end of the year, an increase of around £100m in just six months. This week we report on a Scottish charity that has collapsed as a result of its shortfall.

As more of these stories emerge, the sector will need a good argument to maintain support.

Circus’ conclusion to his letter to The Times is a stark warning for the sector: “For too long, charities have hidden behind the natural reluctance of people to question anything that operates under a cloak of charity…charitable donations are in large measure public money, and if public confidence is to be retained, there needs to be a far greater degree of scrutiny and accountability.”

 

Stolen
none
none
31 Jul 2010

There is an unproven assumption of not enough capable top people who move between the public and private sector and are willing do a charity stint for a less than competitive private sector compensation package.

Now this is not a matter of such persons being charitable but a balance between self-interest and active citizenship.

Self-interest because there are limited top opportunities in any sector and as such limited top opportunities for proving competence.

And as for the pension deficit, many charity chief executives have long refused to deal with it as a matter of personal self-interest. And have not properly drawn the matter to the attention of their Trustees.

Celina Ribeiro
28 Jul 2010

In this UK charities should look to the US, where scandals over charity management pay are really starting to gather (even more) steam.

A new provision in the New Jersey budget puts caps on what charities can pay their chief execs if the organisation is providing social services.

Two weeks ago the Chronicle of Philanthropy also noted - in news that naturally got picked up everywhere - that while donations have fallen, chief exec salaries have risen.

All of which is fine, if you subscribe to the view that in order to attract excellence charities must compete with the commercial world on the basis of executive renumeration.

However, the sector - both here and in the US - has not really managed to put the case forward to the public in a convincing way. Perhaps the sector should stop acting embarassed about its professionalism, and treat it as a matter of pride.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Ian Allsop (41) David Davison (36) John Tate (32) Paul Bennett (22) Tania Mason (19) Gordon Hunter (17) Robert Ashton (15) Daniel Phelan (13) Gareth Jones (8) Vibeka Mair (6) Less +++ More +++

Raspbery Pi - the future of computing

4 May 2012

John Tate introduces the new big thing in the world of computing.

Would you donate your desktop to charity?

4 May 2012

Would you hand your PC desktop background over to advertisers if it was fundraising for a good cause?...

A solution to regulating society lotteries

26 Apr 2012

Inspired by a debate between Joe Saxton and an employee of the Gambling Commission, David Philpott devises...

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

Timeline: Coalition government so far

14 May 2012

It’s two years since Britain voted in the previously unlikely coalition of the Conservatives and Liberal...