Cuts may prove to be a vital wake-up call to charities

Cuts may prove to be a vital wake-up call to charities

Cuts may prove to be a vital wake-up call to charities3

Finance | Andy Williamson | 19 Jul 2010

Andy Williamson explores why the forthcoming cuts should be welcomed by the sector.

It is difficult to escape the two words “government cuts” whenever reading any newspaper or watching and listening to the broadcast media. Almost everyone is going to express an opinion for reasons of politics or vested interest; and in the midst of such a heated maelstrom, most facts and reasoned argument will disappear.

It is an inescapable truth that government must reduce its excessive spending; all parties are agreed on that fact. It serves no further purpose to talk about who is to blame, listen to the public sector and it is all the “greedy bankers” yet listen to the private sector and it is years of excessive public sector spending on “non-jobs”.

The reality of course, is that it is a bit of both with a few more things aside. What now needs to happen is to disregard that debate and concentrate on creating a better Britain. Civil society, voluntary and not-for-profit organisations can and should be a vital part of that recovery.

However the voluntary sector is not immune to the pressures facing the public sector and in many cases, far too many in truth, they are inextricably linked. This is why the cuts can actually prove to be a good thing in the long term.

First of all society probably needs to define “a charity” better. Is a charity that is wholly reliant on state funding anything but another branch of the public sector in reality? Is one that is part-funded or majority-funded by the state providing a value-for-money service meeting needs that otherwise could not be met? Perhaps the majority of UK citizens view a charity as part of Mr Cameron’s 'Big Society' providing something that is either needed or desirable that is not funded in any way by the state.

Much like the public sector, the voluntary sector has exploded with a growth over the last ten years with seemingly endless funds available via national or local authorities yet the question of whether such services are needed or even desired is often ignored.

There is no god-given right to exist as a charity simply because you can

We have now reached a situation, for the first time in 15 years, where authorities are having to ask such questions and start to question how funds are spent.  The voluntary sector doesn’t like it and is already resorting to the left-wing shock tactics of “people are suffering”, “vital services will be lost” etc…without putting any solid arguments in place to justify such statements.

Reform is badly needed. Charities should be examined much more closely than happens at present and should only exist if the criteria of needed or desirable services are delivered in a cost-effective manner; and such services are measured by impact and outcomes rather than on subjective opinion.

I know of numerous charities that raise funds but deliver very poor services; some are positively hostile to the idea of fundraising to meet their financial needs and adopt the view that “we should be funded”.

No-one has an automatic right to funding and I would argue that if a charity or not-for-profit organisation can clearly demonstrate a need or societal desire for their services then they can attract voluntary funding simply by getting proper fundraisers in place and being more savvy about key messages.

People will support a good cause; that has been proved for many years, but what they don’t readily accept any more is a simple platitude or expectation of supporting such.

Charities must clearly demonstrate their worth and their impact with meaningful services, not just to the donating public, but to government, local authorities and regulatory bodies. It is too easy to arrogantly bat away concerns as “interference” or “lack of appreciation/understanding”.

There is no god-given right to exist as a charity simply because you can. That is why the government cuts could prove to be the vital wake-up call that has long been needed in the voluntary sector. Some services may well disappear but that won’t necessarily be a bad thing. The good ones will survive and thrive and that is what is more important.

Andy Williamson is chief executive of the Warwickshire Northamptonshire Air Ambulance

Helena Holt
2 Aug 2010

Having worked in this sector for more than 20 years I've seen more funding models than you can shake a stick at and both excellent and abysmal practice at all stages on the statutory/voluntary income spectrum.

One other inescapable truth is that the causes which are least appealing will also be amongst the easiest to cut, regardless of how good the service provision is. Big society may well prove effective in areas with plenty of social capital and relatively simple social needs. But in some of the areas I've worked in in the past and with some of the people I worked with and for, there will be very few people both willing and able to step into the breach with community led independently funded initiatives. The cost of withdrawing funding from these people and areas will be met by all of us in the long run of course, in increased demands on health and prison services.

I am wholeheartedly grateful for the amazing support the charity I currently lead receives from the people and businesses of Devon. I am very glad we are in a position to be completely independent of government funding but I am acutely aware that this is only because it is a popular cause with almost universal appeal.

A small part of me is very relieved that I am no longer trying to raise funds for community care services for chaotic and challenging people with mental health, drug and alcohol problems in Inner London. I can honestly say that the charities I've previously led have been much more rigorously monitored and evaluated because of the statutory funding they received. I try to apply the same level of accountability wherever I am but surprisingly there are relatively few people who ask searching questions of charities like ours.

Jay Kennedy
Head of Policy
Directory of Social Change
21 Jul 2010

Individual citizens DO have a right to set up and support charities. It is the right of individuals in a free society to associate with each other - and doing this using legal forms such as charity is one very well-established way of doing so in the UK. But you are right to say that nobody is entitled to any funding, especially from the state.

However, arguing that charities should only exist if they can demonstrate maximum cost-effiency and measured quantifiable impact is nonsense. We're not the public sector. The vast majority of charities don't get any public sector money - or any money at all actually. This agenda of trying to rationalise civil society will simply end up stifling it.

Ed Tait
20 Jul 2010

You seem to be insinuating that only statutory funded charities run second rate services - where is your evidence for this?

If anything, it’s more likely to be the exact opposite.

The sort of scrutiny a charity receives from statutory funders is far more detailed and sophisticated than that received by individual donors. And it is very often the smaller, local and unfashionable charities that receive mostly statutory funding.

Take Refugee and Migrant Justice as an example; they recently folded as statutory payments were changed to paid-by-results (‘results’ in this field take years, whilst the charity is taking on cost all the time). It was nothing to do with the vital service they provided to some of the most vulnerable people in Britain. I'm sure they tried to diversity their funding portfolio, but funnily enough refugees aren't top of the list when it comes to individual giving.

And the result? Thousands of people in desperate need will get no support and be in real danger; that is not just "left-wing shock tactics" but the grim truth.

Yes, the sector will need to reform, and yes, some charities that weren’t particularly good may fold – but they will fold at the same time as many good charities doing vital work.

When millions are out of work, and thousands will be left genuinely destitute, society needs more than ever a well-funded voluntary (and public) sector.

It’s certainly no time to be smug, and it's breathtakingly cruel to crow at the misfortune of those less fortunate.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Ian Allsop (66) John Tate (59) David Davison (51) Robert Ashton (40) Andrew Hind CB (24) Tania Mason (23) Gordon Hunter (17) Daniel Phelan (15) David Ainsworth (15) Vibeka Mair (12)
David Philpott (10) Niki May Young (8) Rui Domingues (8) Celina Ribeiro (7) Andrew Chaggar (5) James Brooke Turner (4) Sir Stuart Etherington (4) Kate Sayer (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Garreth Spillane (3) Alistair Gibbons (3) Ian Clark (3) Claris D'cruz (2) Stephen Lloyd (2) Richard Maitland (2) Adrian Beney (2) Iain Pritchard (2) Pauline Broomhead (2) Martin Brookes (2) Tesse Akpeki (2) Nick Brooks (2) Stephen Hammersley (2) Rosie Chapman (2) Geetha Rabindrakumar (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Kirsty Weakley (2) Dan Corry (2) Peter Holbrook (2) Belinda Pratten (2) Simon Steeden (2) Jonathan Bruck (2) Dan Gregory (2) Carolyn Sims (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Mark Astarita (1) Don Bawtree (1) Sir Stephen Bubb (1) Victoria Cook (1) Lindsay Gray (1) Rachel Holmes (1) Nick Ivey (1) Iona Joy (1) John Kelly (1) Michael King (1) Heather Lamont (1) Lucy McLynn (1) Chris Oulton (1) Julian Rathbone (1) Socrates Socratous (1) Richard Weaver (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Roger Chester (1) Matthew Bowcock (1) Joe Saxton (1) Reuben Turner (1) Martin Farrell (1) Paul Gibson (1) Jonathon Grapsas (1) Andrew Scadding (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Su Sayer (1) Debra Allcock Tyler (1) Martin Birch (1) Mark Hallam (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Sara Llewellin (1) John Low (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Ruth Murphy (1) Colin Nee (1) Julia Unwin (1) Kate Rogers (1) Malcolm Hayday (1) Filippo Addarii (1) Kimberley Scharf (1) Jakes Ferguson (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Joe Turner (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Andy Williamson (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andrew Samuel (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Paul Amadi (1) Luke Fletcher (1) Peter Mitchell (1) Billy Dove (1) Andrew Ketteringham (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Lynne Robb (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Paul Emery (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Pesh Framjee (1) Sukhvinder Kaur-Stubbs (1) Moira Protani (1) Vicki Prout (1) Michael O'Toole (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Paul Farmer (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) Logan Anderson (1) Andy Rich (1) Sharon Martin (1) Asheem Singh (1) Leigh Daynes (1) Abdurahman Sharif (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Richard Caulfield (1) Ashley Horsey (1) Andrew O'Brien (1)
Less +++ More +++

Social Charity Spy: Scope launches spoof video for charity shop donation drive

3 Jul 2015

Both Scope and Terrence Higgins Trust have produced eye-catching videos to highlight their current campaigns...

Social Charity Spy: St Gemma's Hospice's wedding dress appeal goes viral

12 Jun 2015

This week a social media call-out leads to an unexpected windfall for St Gemma’s Hospice, Plan UK launch...

Could charities be hoodwinked by technology?

1 Jun 2015

Polling errors at the general election show that human judgement is still critical in using digital technology,...

Society is changing in ways that have specific consequences for volunteering

22 Jun 2015

Gillian Guy, chief executive of Citizens Advice, explains why charities need to respond to changes in...

Society Diary: Miley Cyrus takes off her clothes, cuddles a pig and talks about charity

12 Jun 2015

Our weekly round-up of interesting and outlandish information, collected from the corners of the charity...

Is it time for charities to fight back on chief executive pay?

10 Jun 2015

The charity sector has suffered in silence through repeated attacks on its leaders over their pay, but...